Selected article for: "block design and complete block design"

Author: Crenshaw, J. D.; Campbell, J. M.; Polo, J.; Stein, H. H.
Title: Effects of specialty proteins as alternatives to bovine or porcine spray-dried plasma in non-medicated diets fed to weaned pigs housed in an unsanitary environment
  • Document date: 2017_9_23
  • ID: zzol1ard_18
    Snippet: Both experiments were analyzed as a randomized complete block design with weaning group being the block and the pen being the experimental unit. Data were analyzed using a mixed model (PROC MIXED, SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC) for repeated measures of treatment, day of experiment, and treatment × d interaction as fixed effects, block and replicate as random effects, and replicate within block as subtype for repeated measures (Littell et al., 1998) ......
    Document: Both experiments were analyzed as a randomized complete block design with weaning group being the block and the pen being the experimental unit. Data were analyzed using a mixed model (PROC MIXED, SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC) for repeated measures of treatment, day of experiment, and treatment × d interaction as fixed effects, block and replicate as random effects, and replicate within block as subtype for repeated measures (Littell et al., 1998) . Least squares treatment means were calculated and are reported for each independent variable and differences among treatments were separated using the PDIFF option of SAS. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Trends or tendencies are discussed at P ≥ 0.05 to P < 0.10.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • block design and pen block: 1, 2, 3
    • experiment day and mixed model: 1, 2
    • experimental unit and pen block: 1
    • experimental unit and random effect: 1, 2
    • independent variable and mixed model: 1, 2, 3
    • independent variable and random effect: 1
    • mixed model and random effect: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25