Selected article for: "APP diet and SDPP diet"

Author: Crenshaw, J. D.; Campbell, J. M.; Polo, J.; Stein, H. H.
Title: Effects of specialty proteins as alternatives to bovine or porcine spray-dried plasma in non-medicated diets fed to weaned pigs housed in an unsanitary environment
  • Document date: 2017_9_23
  • ID: zzol1ard_23
    Snippet: After all pigs were provided the common phase 2 diet starting on d 15 of the study, pigs previously fed the 2.50% SDPP diet in phase 1 had greater (P < 0.05) BW at d 21 than the SPC or the APP diets. At d 28, average BW was greater (P < 0.05) for pigs previously fed the 2.50% SDPP diet than the SPC, 0.33 or 1.00% APP diets. The cumulative ADG of pigs at d 21 was higher (P < 0.05) for the previously fed 2.50% SDPP diet compared with SPC or 0.33% A.....
    Document: After all pigs were provided the common phase 2 diet starting on d 15 of the study, pigs previously fed the 2.50% SDPP diet in phase 1 had greater (P < 0.05) BW at d 21 than the SPC or the APP diets. At d 28, average BW was greater (P < 0.05) for pigs previously fed the 2.50% SDPP diet than the SPC, 0.33 or 1.00% APP diets. The cumulative ADG of pigs at d 21 was higher (P < 0.05) for the previously fed 2.50% SDPP diet compared with SPC or 0.33% APP diets. Also, ADFI of pigs at d 21 was higher (P < 0.05) for the 2.50% SDPP diet compared with SPC or APP diets. From d 0 to 28, ADFI was higher (P < 0.05) for pigs fed the 2.50% SDPP diet compared with SPC, 0.33 or 1.00% APP diets.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • app diet and SDPP diet: 1, 2, 3
    • app diet and SPC compare: 1
    • app diet SPC SDPP diet and SDPP diet: 1
    • common phase and SDPP diet: 1, 2