Selected article for: "Albany attack rate and contact reduction scenario"

Author: Milne, George J; Baskaran, Pravin; Halder, Nilimesh; Karl, Stephan; Kelso, Joel
Title: Pandemic influenza in Papua New Guinea: a modelling study comparison with pandemic spread in a developed country
  • Document date: 2013_3_26
  • ID: y01w04lc_206
    Snippet: The effects of variation of the timing of intervention initiation are presented in Table A6 . In the school closure scenario, delayed response had the most severe impact on the attack rates in Albany, whereas for the Madang models the changes in attack rate were marginal. This is again due to a large fraction of children not attending school and the existence of neighbourhood hubs. Similary, in the rigourous contact reduction scenario the effect .....
    Document: The effects of variation of the timing of intervention initiation are presented in Table A6 . In the school closure scenario, delayed response had the most severe impact on the attack rates in Albany, whereas for the Madang models the changes in attack rate were marginal. This is again due to a large fraction of children not attending school and the existence of neighbourhood hubs. Similary, in the rigourous contact reduction scenario the effect of delayed response on attack rate was also more pronounced in the Albany model. However in comparison to school closure only, the effect on attack rate in Madang was also increased.'

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Albany attack rate and school closure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
    • Albany attack rate and school closure scenario: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • Albany attack rate and severe impact: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • Albany model and school attend: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • Albany model and school closure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • Albany model and school closure scenario: 1, 2, 3
    • Albany model and severe impact: 1
    • attack rate and school attend: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • attack rate and school closure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • attack rate and school closure scenario: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • attack rate and severe impact: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • contact reduction and school closure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • contact reduction and school closure scenario: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • contact reduction and severe impact: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • contact reduction scenario and school closure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • contact reduction scenario and school closure scenario: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • contact reduction scenario and severe impact: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • delay response and school closure: 1
    • delay response and severe impact: 1