Selected article for: "little effect and subsequent variation"
Author: Milne, George J; Baskaran, Pravin; Halder, Nilimesh; Karl, Stephan; Kelso, Joel
Title: Pandemic influenza in Papua New Guinea: a modelling study comparison with pandemic spread in a developed country
  • Document date: 2013_3_26
    • ID: y01w04lc_97
    Snippet: After the beginning of a sustained local epidemic, any subsequent variation in the amount of seeding has very little effect on the progress of the local epidemic, as the number of imported cases is much smaller than those generated by the local epidemic. Preliminary analyses using the present model have shown that even if the seeding rate is increased to 5 infections per day, after 7 days the number of infections generated from the self-sustained.....
    Document: After the beginning of a sustained local epidemic, any subsequent variation in the amount of seeding has very little effect on the progress of the local epidemic, as the number of imported cases is much smaller than those generated by the local epidemic. Preliminary analyses using the present model have shown that even if the seeding rate is increased to 5 infections per day, after 7 days the number of infections generated from the self-sustained local epidemic is twice the number of imported infections, and by 14 days local infections outnumber imported infections by a factor of 8.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • local epidemic progress little effect and seeding rate: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • local epidemic progress little effect and seeding subsequent variation: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • local epidemic progress little effect and subsequent variation: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • local infection and preliminary analysis: 1
    • local infection and present model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • local infection and self sustain: 1
    • present model and seeding rate: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • present model and seeding subsequent variation: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • present model and subsequent variation: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • present model and sustained local epidemic: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • present model and sustained local epidemic beginning: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • seeding rate and subsequent variation: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • seeding rate and sustained local epidemic: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • seeding rate and sustained local epidemic beginning: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • seeding subsequent variation and subsequent variation: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • seeding subsequent variation and sustained local epidemic: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • seeding subsequent variation and sustained local epidemic beginning: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • subsequent variation and sustained local epidemic: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • subsequent variation and sustained local epidemic beginning: 1, 2, 3, 4