Author: Xi Zhang; Hua-Xiang Rao; Yuwan Wu; Yubei Huang; Hongji Dai
Title: Comparison of the spatiotemporal characteristics of the COVID-19 and SARS outbreaks in mainland China Document date: 2020_3_26
ID: brwmpm5a_31
Snippet: Province. In addition, we identified 4 significant clusters at P < 0.01 and 5 significant clusters at P < 0.05. Specifically, Liaoning, Inner Mongolia, and most western provinces had significantly low-low spatial clustering, whereas Anhui, Hunan and Jiangxi of Central China had significantly low-high spatial clustering. For SARS, two significant high-high (Beijing and Tianjin) and low-high (Hebei) clusters were detected. Sichuan, Tibet and Anhui .....
Document: Province. In addition, we identified 4 significant clusters at P < 0.01 and 5 significant clusters at P < 0.05. Specifically, Liaoning, Inner Mongolia, and most western provinces had significantly low-low spatial clustering, whereas Anhui, Hunan and Jiangxi of Central China had significantly low-high spatial clustering. For SARS, two significant high-high (Beijing and Tianjin) and low-high (Hebei) clusters were detected. Sichuan, Tibet and Anhui showed significant low-low clustering (Fig. 4) .
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- low low and significantly low low spatial clustering: 1, 2
- low low and spatial clustering: 1, 2, 3
- low low clustering and significantly low high spatial clustering: 1, 2
- low low clustering and significantly low low spatial clustering: 1, 2
- low low clustering and spatial clustering: 1, 2
- significant cluster and spatial clustering: 1
- significantly low high spatial clustering and spatial clustering: 1, 2
- significantly low low spatial clustering and spatial clustering: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date