Author: Olsen, Kristin M; Gabler, Nicholas K; Rademacher, Chris J; Schwartz, Kent J; Schweer, Wesley P; Gourley, Gene G; Patience, John F
Title: The effects of group size and subtherapeutic antibiotic alternatives on growth performance and morbidity of nursery pigs: a model for feed additive evaluation Document date: 2018_7_6
ID: r6xzqu6a_27
Snippet: For the overall period (days 0-41), there were impacts of both dietary treatment and group size, and their interaction, on piglet growth performance. There was an interaction between diet and group size for ADG (P = 0.012) and ADFI (P =0.015). Pigs fed the PC had higher ADG and ADFI than the NC for both group sizes (P < 0.05), and pigs fed the ZA diet only had a higher ADG and ADFI than the NC in the large groups (P < 0.05). Small groups fed the .....
Document: For the overall period (days 0-41), there were impacts of both dietary treatment and group size, and their interaction, on piglet growth performance. There was an interaction between diet and group size for ADG (P = 0.012) and ADFI (P =0.015). Pigs fed the PC had higher ADG and ADFI than the NC for both group sizes (P < 0.05), and pigs fed the ZA diet only had a higher ADG and ADFI than the NC in the large groups (P < 0.05). Small groups fed the NC and DR diets had higher ADG compared to large groups fed these diets (P < 0.05). However, small and large groups had similar ADG for the PC and ZA diets (P > 0.05). The mean ADG for large groups was 0.280 kg and was 0.293 kg for small groups (main effect P = 0.006). Small groups had similar ADFI to large groups except for the NC control diet where small groups had higher ADFI (P < 0.05). There was no interaction between diet and group size for G:F; pigs fed the PC diet were more efficient than pigs fed the NC, ZA, and DR diets (diet P < 0.001), and small groups were more feed efficient than large groups (group size P = 0.004). There was no impact of the DR diet on growth performance (P > 0.05).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- control diet and dietary treatment: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- control diet and DR diet: 1
- control diet and DR NC diet: 1
- control diet and group diet: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- control diet and growth performance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
- diet feed and group diet: 1, 2, 3
- diet feed and group size: 1
- diet feed and growth performance: 1, 2, 3, 4
- dietary treatment and DR diet: 1
- dietary treatment and DR NC diet: 1
- dietary treatment and group diet: 1, 2
- dietary treatment and group diet size: 1
- dietary treatment and group size: 1
- dietary treatment and growth performance: 1, 2, 3, 4
- DR diet and DR NC diet: 1, 2, 3
- DR diet and group diet: 1
- DR diet and group diet size: 1
- DR diet and group size: 1
- DR NC diet and group diet: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date