Author: Kleinman, Steve; Stassinopoulos, Adonis
Title: Risks associated with red blood cell transfusions: potential benefits from application of pathogen inactivation Document date: 2015_8_25
ID: qlddzgbg_5
Snippet: The 2011 HHS National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey estimated a mean per-patient RBC dose of 2.75 units annually, 2 and a 5-year retrospective study in a regional hospital system reported a mean of 2.9 (62.7) RBC units per transfused inpatient. 3 However, there is substantial interpatient variability in RBC units transfused due to clinical diagnoses of the patient, the indication for transfusion, long established physician practice patt.....
Document: The 2011 HHS National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey estimated a mean per-patient RBC dose of 2.75 units annually, 2 and a 5-year retrospective study in a regional hospital system reported a mean of 2.9 (62.7) RBC units per transfused inpatient. 3 However, there is substantial interpatient variability in RBC units transfused due to clinical diagnoses of the patient, the indication for transfusion, long established physician practice patterns, and the presence or absence of patient blood management programs. Figure 1 provides a theoretical schema for understanding a recipient's risk of acquiring a transfusion-transmitted infection, which is dependent on two factors: the number of units transfused (e.g., a higher risk with more units) and whether transfusion occurs when an undetected emerging infectious agent (EIA) is in the blood supply. This latter time-related risk is higher for recipients whose transfusion exposure spans a longer time interval. 1, 4 Factors relevant to clinical outcome of a transfusion-transmitted infection include the expected length of recipient survival due to underlying disease and the increased susceptibility of different patient populations (based on their degree of immunosuppression) to adverse clinical outcomes secondary to infectious disease transmission. 5 Thus, a logical way to categorize RBC recipients is both by number of units transfused and by the time interval over which transfusions occur. In Table 1 , [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] which forms the basis of a per-patient risk analysis for selected patient groups, we synthesized existing RBC usage and transfusion practice data for illustrative diagnoses into a five-tiered classification scheme based on acute (single transfusion episode), intermittent (multiple episodes), or chronic (often lifetime) RBC transfusion therapy.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absence presence and clinical diagnosis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- absence presence and clinical outcome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
- absence presence and disease transmission: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- absence presence and high risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- absence presence and hospital system: 1
- blood management and clinical diagnosis: 1, 2, 3, 4
- blood management and clinical outcome: 1, 2
- blood management and high risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- blood management and hospital system: 1
- blood management program and high risk: 1
- blood supply and disease transmission: 1, 2, 3, 4
- blood supply and high risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- classification scheme and clinical diagnosis: 1
- classification scheme and clinical outcome: 1
- classification scheme and high risk: 1
- clinical diagnosis and disease transmission: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- clinical diagnosis and high risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- clinical diagnosis and hospital system: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
- clinical diagnosis and illustrative diagnosis: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date