Author: Hellewell, Joel; Abbott, Sam; Gimma, Amy; Bosse, Nikos I; Jarvis, Christopher I; Russell, Timothy W; Munday, James D; Kucharski, Adam J; Edmunds, W John; Funk, Sebastian; Eggo, Rosalind M
Title: Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts Document date: 2020_2_28
ID: ueb7mjnv_19
Snippet: After an incubation period, person A shows symptoms and is isolated at a time drawn from the delay distribution (table) . A draw from the negative binomial distribution with mean reproduction number (R 0 ) and distribution parameter determines how many people person A potentially infects. For each of those, a serial interval is drawn. Two of these exposures occur before the time person A is isolated. Each contact is traced with probability Ï, wi.....
Document: After an incubation period, person A shows symptoms and is isolated at a time drawn from the delay distribution (table) . A draw from the negative binomial distribution with mean reproduction number (R 0 ) and distribution parameter determines how many people person A potentially infects. For each of those, a serial interval is drawn. Two of these exposures occur before the time person A is isolated. Each contact is traced with probability Ï, with probability 1-Ï they are missed by contact tracing. Person B is successfully traced, which means that they will be isolated without delay when they develop symptoms. They could, however, still infect others before they are isolated. Person C is missed by contact tracing. This means that they are only detected if and when symptomatic, and are isolated after a delay from symptom onset. Because person C was not traced, they infected two more people (E and F), in addition to person D, than if they had been isolated at symptom onset. A version with subclinical transmission is given in the appendix (p 12). set to the incubation period for that case, an SD of 2, and a skew parameter chosen such that a set proportion of serial intervals were shorter than the incubation period (meaning that a set proportion of transmission happened before symptom onset; figure 2 ). This sampling approach ensured that the serial interval and incubation period for each case was correlated, and prevented biologically implausible scenarios where a case could develop symptoms soon after exposure, but not become infectious until very late after exposure and vice versa.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- binomial distribution and delay distribution: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- binomial distribution and distribution parameter: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- binomial distribution and incubation period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- binomial distribution and incubation period serial interval: 1
- case incubation period and contact tracing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- case incubation period and delay distribution: 1, 2
- case incubation period and distribution parameter: 1, 2, 3, 4
- case incubation period and incubation period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- case incubation period and incubation period serial interval: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- case incubation period serial interval and contact tracing: 1
- case incubation period serial interval and distribution parameter: 1, 2, 3
- case incubation period serial interval and incubation period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- case incubation period serial interval and incubation period serial interval: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- case incubation period set and contact tracing: 1
- case incubation period set and distribution parameter: 1, 2, 3
- case incubation period set and incubation period: 1, 2, 3, 4
- case incubation period set and incubation period serial interval: 1, 2, 3
- contact tracing and delay distribution: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- contact tracing and distribution parameter: 1, 2, 3, 4
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date