Author: Peña, José; Chen-Harris, Haiyin; Allen, Jonathan E.; Hwang, Mona; Elsheikh, Maher; Mabery, Shalini; Bielefeldt-Ohmann, Helle; Zemla, Adam T.; Bowen, Richard A.; Borucki, Monica K.
Title: Sendai virus intra-host population dynamics and host immunocompetence influence viral virulence during in vivo passage Document date: 2016_4_9
ID: z7f720dj_50
Snippet: Although SeV primers were designed to be as sensitive to variant SeV genomes as possible, amplification of some regions of viral genome proved to be extremely difficult for many of the samples, with selenium deficient diet passage 1 samples showing the poorest amplification results. Many different combinations of primers were used in order to amplify as much of the viral genome as possible (Supplementary Table S1 ). To determine if the poor PCR a.....
Document: Although SeV primers were designed to be as sensitive to variant SeV genomes as possible, amplification of some regions of viral genome proved to be extremely difficult for many of the samples, with selenium deficient diet passage 1 samples showing the poorest amplification results. Many different combinations of primers were used in order to amplify as much of the viral genome as possible (Supplementary Table S1 ). To determine if the poor PCR amplification results were due to low numbers of viral genomes present in each sample, viral titers were determined by both plaque assay and Taqman PCR. The average number of positive PCR results per region (best possible score is two primers per region) was compared with the viral titer (PFU/ ml) and to the C t (cycle threshold) average of two replicates. The average C t had a negative correlation with positive PCR results (r ¼ À0.97), however there was no correlation between PCR outcome and viral titer as determined by plaque assay (r ¼ À0.35). Number of viral genomes per PCR reaction was estimated using standard curve derived from control SeV plasmid dilutions and values ranged from $800 genomes (sample SD4.P10, PCR score of 0) per PCR reaction to 25 million genomes (FD2.P10, PCR score of 2). These data indicate that lack of PCR amplification most likely resulted from a low number of total viral genomes, present in the sample (both infectious and non-infectious).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- amplification result and low number: 1, 2
- amplification result and PCR amplification: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- amplification result and PCR amplification result: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- amplification result and PCR reaction: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- amplification result and PCR result: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- amplification result and poor amplification result: 1
- average number and cycle threshold: 1, 2
- average number and different combination: 1, 2
- average number and low number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
- average number and negative correlation: 1, 2, 3, 4
- average number and PCR amplification: 1, 2, 3, 4
- average number and PCR reaction: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- average number and PCR result: 1
- average number and plaque assay: 1, 2
- cycle threshold and PCR outcome: 1, 2, 3, 4
- cycle threshold and PCR reaction: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- cycle threshold and PCR reaction viral genome: 1
- cycle threshold and PCR result: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- cycle threshold and PCR score: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date