Author: Lee, Mi Suk; Oh, Jee Youn; Kang, Cheol-In; Kim, Eu Suk; Park, Sunghoon; Rhee, Chin Kook; Jung, Ji Ye; Jo, Kyung-Wook; Heo, Eun Young; Park, Dong-Ah; Suh, Gee Young; Kiem, Sungmin
Title: Guideline for Antibiotic Use in Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia Document date: 2018_6_26
ID: sl4u8e6e_104
Snippet: It is unclear between the PSI and CURB-65 or CRB-65, which is superior. There have not been any randomized studies that compare these two scoring systems. In addition, studies that have compared the predictive power of the two scoring systems using identical patient groups have reported similar predictive power between the two systems [113, [119] [120] [121] [122] , and thus, one cannot say one is superior to the other. In some studies, the PSI s.....
Document: It is unclear between the PSI and CURB-65 or CRB-65, which is superior. There have not been any randomized studies that compare these two scoring systems. In addition, studies that have compared the predictive power of the two scoring systems using identical patient groups have reported similar predictive power between the two systems [113, [119] [120] [121] [122] , and thus, one cannot say one is superior to the other. In some studies, the PSI showed more excellent results. According to a study in which the developer of the PSI participated as a co-researcher, the PSI classifies a larger number of patients as the low-risk group compared with the CURB-65 (PSI I-III, 68% vs. CURB-65 <2, 61%), similar mortality rates are observed between the two groups, and the CURB-65 had significantly higher predictive power measured in terms of AUC than the PSI [107] .
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- group observe and patient group: 1
- large number and low risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- large number and low risk group: 1
- large number and mortality rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- large number and patient group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- large number and patient large number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- large number and predictive power: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- low risk and mortality rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- low risk and patient group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
- low risk and predictive power: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- low risk group and mortality rate: 1, 2
- low risk group and patient group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- low risk group and predictive power: 1, 2
- mortality rate and patient group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- mortality rate and predictive power: 1, 2, 3
- patient group and predictive power: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date