Selected article for: "access patient and low income"

Author: Palagyi, Anna; Dodd, Rebecca; Jan, Stephen; Nambiar, Devaki; Joshi, Rohina; Tian, Maoyi; Abimbola, Seye; Peiris, David
Title: Organisation of primary health care in the Asia-Pacific region: developing a prioritised research agenda
  • Document date: 2019_8_16
  • ID: zjsjgd31_3
    Snippet: Health system planners in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC) of the Asia-Pacific region seeking to reorient primary health care (PHC) systems to achieve universal health coverage may be hindered by lack of knowledge of what works in their setting. With limited resources for research available, it is important to identify evidence-based strategies for reorganising PHC delivery, determine where relevant evidence gaps exist and prioritise these .....
    Document: Health system planners in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC) of the Asia-Pacific region seeking to reorient primary health care (PHC) systems to achieve universal health coverage may be hindered by lack of knowledge of what works in their setting. With limited resources for research available, it is important to identify evidence-based strategies for reorganising PHC delivery, determine where relevant evidence gaps exist and prioritise these for future study. This paper describes an approach for doing this using the best available evidence combined with consultation to establish evidence priorities. We first reviewed PHC organisational interventions in Asia-Pacific LMICs and ascertained evidence gaps. The largest gaps related to interventions to promote access to essential medicines, patient management tools, effective health promotion strategies and service planning and accountability. Evidence from Pacific Island countries was particularly scant. We then engaged an expert panel of 22 PHC stakeholders from seven Asia-Pacific LMICs in a Delphi exercise to identify priority questions for future research. Research priorities were: (1) identifying effective PHC service delivery models for chronic diseases; (2) devising sustainable models of disease integration; (3) optimising task shifting; (4) understanding barriers to care continuity; (5) projecting future PHC needs; and (6) designing appropriate PHC service packages. Notably, stakeholder-determined priorities reflected large, contextdependent system issues, while evidence gaps centred on discrete interventions. Future research on the organisation of PHC services in Asia-Pacific LMICs should incorporate codesign principles to engage researchers and national PHC system stakeholders, and innovative methods that build on existing evidence and account for system complexity.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accountability service planning and Asia Pacific region: 1
    • accountability service planning and available research: 1
    • accountability service planning and chronic disease: 1
    • accountability service planning and continuity care: 1
    • accountability service planning and Delphi exercise: 1
    • accountability service planning and disease integration: 1
    • accountability service planning and PHC service: 1, 2, 3
    • accountability service planning and PHC service delivery: 1, 2, 3
    • accountability service planning and PHC system: 1, 2
    • accountability service planning and primary health care: 1
    • accountability service planning and relevant evidence: 1
    • accountability service planning and research priority: 1, 2
    • accountability service planning and service delivery: 1, 2, 3
    • accountability service planning and service planning: 1, 2, 3
    • accountability service planning and system complexity: 1
    • accountability service planning and system complexity account: 1
    • accountability service planning and task shifting: 1
    • accountability service planning and universal health coverage: 1
    • accountability service planning and universal health coverage achieve: 1