Selected article for: "differential diagnosis and FIP group"

Title: Research Communications of the 27(th) ECVIM-CA Congress: Intercontinental, Saint Julian's, Malta, 14th to 16th September 2017
  • Document date: 2017_11_7
  • ID: roslkxeq_372
    Snippet: The study population consisted of 31 cats with confirmed FIP (six with neurological signs) and a control group of 29 cats (ten with neurological signs) for which FIP was considered a differential diagnosis, but which were definitively diagnosed with other diseases. CSF of these cats was tested for presence of feline coronavirus (FCoV) RNA by RT-qPCR and in positive cases, the pathotype was determined according to the S gene sequence. Sensitivity .....
    Document: The study population consisted of 31 cats with confirmed FIP (six with neurological signs) and a control group of 29 cats (ten with neurological signs) for which FIP was considered a differential diagnosis, but which were definitively diagnosed with other diseases. CSF of these cats was tested for presence of feline coronavirus (FCoV) RNA by RT-qPCR and in positive cases, the pathotype was determined according to the S gene sequence. Sensitivity and specificity including 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents