Selected article for: "direct activation and ifn type"

Author: Mack, Ethan A.; Kallal, Lara E.; Demers, Delia A.; Biron, Christine A.
Title: Type 1 Interferon Induction of Natural Killer Cell Gamma Interferon Production for Defense during Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Infection
  • Document date: 2011_8_9
  • ID: qkwo747o_20
    Snippet: The peritoneal responses reported here demonstrate that by being receptive to early type 1 IFN signaling with IFN-␥ production, NK cells can serve as sensors for and responders to the presence of viral pathogens. The studies surprisingly reveal a previously elusive role for NK cells in early defense against LCMV. In comparison to other viral infections in compartments outside the peritoneal cavity, LCMV has been shown to be relatively insensiti.....
    Document: The peritoneal responses reported here demonstrate that by being receptive to early type 1 IFN signaling with IFN-␥ production, NK cells can serve as sensors for and responders to the presence of viral pathogens. The studies surprisingly reveal a previously elusive role for NK cells in early defense against LCMV. In comparison to other viral infections in compartments outside the peritoneal cavity, LCMV has been shown to be relatively insensitive to the direct antiviral effects of NK cells (40) (41) (42) or IFN-␥ (43) . Our previous attempts to access NK cell IFN-␥ in defense against LCMV have shown that administration of IL-12 prior to infection can induce the response to result in under a 1-log decrease in splenic viral titers (44) . In this report, infection-induced IFN-␥, dependent on NK cells, was shown to proportionally limit viral burden at this first site of infection. Thus, though modest, there is a documented effect of the NK cells and IFN-␥ during LCMV infection. The mechanism for the antiviral effect mediated by IFN-␥ is not known. Given the rapid kinetics, it is likely to be a result of the activation of direct antiviral effects in infected cells or macrophages rather than enhancement of adaptive immune functions resulting from promoting major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class 1 expression or CD8 T cell effector functions (45) . It remains to be determined whether or not the NK cell IFN-␥ elicited by type 1 IFNs will be a more important first response in defense against other more sensitive viral infections and/or for promoting immunoregulatory functions.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • administration show and infection site: 1
    • antiviral effect and cell effector: 1
    • antiviral effect and early type: 1, 2
    • antiviral effect and immune function: 1, 2
    • antiviral effect and infected cell: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • antiviral effect and infection site: 1, 2, 3
    • cell effector and defense response: 1
    • cell effector and early type: 1, 2
    • cell effector and histocompatibility complex: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • cell effector and immune function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • cell effector and infected cell: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • cell effector and infection site: 1, 2, 3
    • cell effector function and histocompatibility complex: 1
    • cell effector function and immune function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • cell effector function and infected cell: 1
    • defense response and early defense: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • defense response and histocompatibility complex: 1, 2, 3
    • defense response and immune function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • defense response and important defense response: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9