Selected article for: "chain reaction and sensitivity high specificity"

Author: Shah, Melisa M; Salvatore, Phillip P; Ford, Laura; Kamitani, Emiko; Whaley, Melissa J; Kaitlin, Mitchell; Currie, Dustin W; Morgan, Clint N; Segaloff, Hannah E; Lecher, Shirley; Somers, Tarah; Van Dyke, Miriam E; Bigouette, John Paul; Delaney, Augustina; DaSilva, Juliana; O’Hegarty, Michelle; Boyle-Estheimer, Lauren; Abdirizak, Fatima; Karpathy, Sandor E; Meece, Jennifer; Ivanic, Lynn; Goffard, Kimberly; Gieryn, Doug; Sterkel, Alana; Bateman, Allen; Kahrs, Juliana; Langolf, Kimberly; Zochert, Tara; Knight, Nancy W; Hsu, Christopher H; Kirking, Hannah L; Tate, Jacqueline E
Title: Performance of Repeat BinaxNOW SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Testing in a Community Setting, Wisconsin, November-December 2020
  • Cord-id: 8kn5s11p
  • Document date: 2021_4_28
  • ID: 8kn5s11p
    Snippet: Repeating the BinaxNOW antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 by two groups of readers within 30 minutes resulted in high concordance (98.9%) in 2,110 encounters. BinaxNOW test sensitivity was 77.2% (258/334) compared to real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Same day antigen testing did not significantly improve test sensitivity while specificity remained high.
    Document: Repeating the BinaxNOW antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 by two groups of readers within 30 minutes resulted in high concordance (98.9%) in 2,110 encounters. BinaxNOW test sensitivity was 77.2% (258/334) compared to real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Same day antigen testing did not significantly improve test sensitivity while specificity remained high.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Try single phrases listed below for: 1
    Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date