Selected article for: "general population and high risk"

Author: Masters, Nina B.; Shih, Shu-Fang; Bukoff, Allen; Akel, Kaitlyn B.; Kobayashi, Lindsay C.; Miller, Alison L.; Harapan, Harapan; Lu, Yihan; Wagner, Abram L.
Title: Social distancing in response to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in the United States
  • Cord-id: 30b1k3r9
  • Document date: 2020_9_11
  • ID: 30b1k3r9
    Snippet: In order to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2, much of the US was placed under social distancing guidelines during March 2020. We characterized risk perceptions and adherence to social distancing recommendations in March 2020 among US adults aged 18+ in an online survey with age and gender quotas to match the general US population (N = 713). We used multivariable logistic and linear regression to estimate associations between age (by generational cohort) and these outcomes. The median perceived ri
    Document: In order to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2, much of the US was placed under social distancing guidelines during March 2020. We characterized risk perceptions and adherence to social distancing recommendations in March 2020 among US adults aged 18+ in an online survey with age and gender quotas to match the general US population (N = 713). We used multivariable logistic and linear regression to estimate associations between age (by generational cohort) and these outcomes. The median perceived risk of infection with COVID-19 within the next month was 32%, and 65% of individuals were practicing more social distancing than before the outbreak. Baby Boomers had lower perceived risk than Millennials (-10.6%, 95% CI: -16.2%, -5.0%), yet were more frequently social distancing (OR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.05, 2.56). Public health outreach should focus on raising compliance with social distancing recommendations, especially among high risk groups. Efforts to address risk perceptions alone may be inadequate.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • activity limit and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • local state and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • local state and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • local state and low socioeconomic status: 1
    • local state government and logistic regression: 1
    • local state government and low income: 1
    • logistic regression and long term care facility: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • logistic regression and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • logistic regression and low perceive: 1