Selected article for: "confidence interval and interquartile range"

Author: Arayasukawat, Pavarit; So-ngern, Apichart; Reechaipichitkul, Wipa; Chumpangern, Worawat; Arunsurat, Itthiphat; Ratanawatkul, Pailin; Chuennok, Wanna
Title: Microorganisms and clinical outcomes of early- and late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia at Srinagarind Hospital, a tertiary center in Northeastern Thailand
  • Cord-id: 45anmiwg
  • Document date: 2021_1_30
  • ID: 45anmiwg
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common nocosomial infection in intensive care unit (ICU). Local microbiological surveillance of pathogens and resistance patterns for early-onset VAP (EOVAP) and late-onset VAP (LOVAP) will help to choose appropriate empiric antibiotics. OBJECTIVE: To compare the multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens, treatment outcomes, and factors associated with hospital mortality of VAP. METHOD: A cross-sectional study between 1 January 2015 and 31 Decemb
    Document: BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common nocosomial infection in intensive care unit (ICU). Local microbiological surveillance of pathogens and resistance patterns for early-onset VAP (EOVAP) and late-onset VAP (LOVAP) will help to choose appropriate empiric antibiotics. OBJECTIVE: To compare the multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens, treatment outcomes, and factors associated with hospital mortality of VAP. METHOD: A cross-sectional study between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017 at Srinagarind hospital, Khon Kaen University was conducted. The demographic data, causative pathogens, hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, mechanical ventilator (MV) days, and hospital mortality were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety patients were enrolled; 42 patients (22%) were EOVAP and 148 patients (78%) were LOVAP. Acinetobacter baumannii was the most common pathogen in both groups (50% EOVAP vs 52.7% LOVAP). MDR pathogens were significant greater in LOVAP (81.8%) than EOVAP (61.9%) (p = 0.007). The EOVAP had a significantly better ICU LOS [median (interquartile range, IQR) 20.0 (11.0, 30.0) vs. 26.5 (17.0, 43.0) days], hospital LOS [median (IQR) 26.5 (15.0, 44.0) vs. 35.5 (24.0, 56.0) days] shorter MV days [median (IQR) 14.0 (10.0, 29.0) vs. 23.0 (14.0, 35.5) days] and lower hospital mortality (16.7% vs 35.1%) than LOVAP (p < 0.05). The factor associated with hospital mortality was having simplified acute physiology (SAP) II score ≥ 40 with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 2.22 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08–4.54, p = 0.02]. CONCLUSION: LOVAP had significantly higher MDR pathogens, MV days, ICU LOS, hospital LOS and hospital mortality than EOVAP. A broad-spectrum antibiotic to cover MDR pathogens should be considered in LOVAP. The factor associated with hospital mortality of VAP was a SAPII score ≥ 40.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acinetobacter baumannii and local study: 1
    • acinetobacter baumannii and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • acinetobacter baumannii and logistic regression analysis: 1
    • acinetobacter baumannii and los stay hospital length: 1
    • acute physiology and additional day: 1
    • acute physiology and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute physiology and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • acute physiology and los stay hospital length: 1, 2
    • additional day and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • additional day and los stay hospital length: 1
    • local distribution and logistic regression: 1
    • local study and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • local study and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2
    • logistic regression analysis and los stay hospital length: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • logistic regression and los stay hospital length: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25