Author: Picon, Rafael V.; Carreno, Ioná; da Silva, André Anjos; Mossmann, Márcio; Laste, Gabriela; Domingues, Guilherme de Campos; Heringer, Lara Faria Fernandes; Gheno, Brenda Rodrigues; Alvarenga, Leticia Leão; Conte, Magali
Title: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Population-based Prevalence, Risk Factors, Hospitalization, and Fatality Rates in Southern Brazil Cord-id: 1pyjs2ta Document date: 2020_9_16
ID: 1pyjs2ta
Snippet: OBJECTIVES: To assess population-based prevalence, risk factors, hospitalization, and infection fatality rates (IFR) associated with COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted two household surveys among the non-institutionalized adult population from May 30 to June 17, 2020, in Lajeado, an 84,000-inhabitants industrial city in southern Brazil. Primary outcome was prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Secondary outcomes were COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths occurring up to June 20, 2020. We summarized pr
Document: OBJECTIVES: To assess population-based prevalence, risk factors, hospitalization, and infection fatality rates (IFR) associated with COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted two household surveys among the non-institutionalized adult population from May 30 to June 17, 2020, in Lajeado, an 84,000-inhabitants industrial city in southern Brazil. Primary outcome was prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Secondary outcomes were COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths occurring up to June 20, 2020. We summarized prevalence rates across surveys with meta-analysis. We assessed age-range IFR and hospitalization rate and regressed these rates over age strata using nonlinear coefficients of determination (R(2)). RESULTS: Summarized overall prevalence was 3.40% (95% CI, 2.74 to 4.18), 34% lower in elderly ≥60 years-old. IFR ranged from 0.08% (0.06 to 0.11) to 4.63% (2.93 to 7.84) in individuals 20 to 39 years-old and ≥60 years-old, respectively. R(2) for exponential age-dependent hospitalization rate and IFR were 0.98 and 0.93 (both p-values <0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first population-based study in Brazil to estimate COVID-19 prevalence, hospitalization and fatality rates per age stratum. Rates were largely age-dependent. Household contacts and MPP workers are at higher risk of infection. Our findings are valuable for health-policy making and resource allocation to mitigate the pandemic.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- accuracy increase and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
- active case and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
- active case and long infection: 1
- active case and long term care facility: 1
- active case and low prevalence: 1
- active infection and adjusted prevalence: 1, 2
- active infection and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
- active infection and long infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
- active infection and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- active infection and low response rate: 1
- adjust logistic regression and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
- adjust logistic regression and long infection: 1
- adjusted prevalence and adolescent child: 1
- adjusted prevalence and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
- adjusted prevalence and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- adolescent child and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
- adolescent child and long infection: 1
- adolescent child and los angeles: 1
- logistic regression and long infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date