Author: Israel Junior Borges do Nascimento; Donal P O'Mathuna; Thilo Caspar von Groote; Hebatullah Mohamed Abdulazeem; Ishanka Weerasekara; Ana Marusic; Livia Puljak; Vinicius Tassoni Civile; Irena Zakarija-Grkovic; Tina Poklepovic Pericic; Alvaro Nagib Atallah; Santino Filoso; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Milena Soriano Marcolino
Title: Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic: An Overview of Systematic Reviews Document date: 2020_4_22
ID: e7o4iub7_59
Snippet: Risk of bias assessment, based on a clearly reported methodological tool, and quality of evidence appraisal, in line with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method, were reported only in one review. 16 Systematic reviews should perform a risk of bias assessment of included primary studies, but only five (27.7%) of the included reviews presented a table summarizing bias. Review authors used a varied numbe.....
Document: Risk of bias assessment, based on a clearly reported methodological tool, and quality of evidence appraisal, in line with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method, were reported only in one review. 16 Systematic reviews should perform a risk of bias assessment of included primary studies, but only five (27.7%) of the included reviews presented a table summarizing bias. Review authors used a varied number of risk of bias tools. Of these, four reviews classified studies as being of ËfairË or Ëappropriate qualityË and one review classified studies as having a high risk of bias. One review mentioned the risk of bias assessment in the methodology but did not provide any related analysis. It is worth mentioning that the reviews used a varied amount of risk of bias tools.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- bias assessment and evidence appraisal: 1, 2
- bias assessment and GRADE method: 1
- bias assessment and high risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- bias assessment and methodological tool: 1, 2, 3, 4
- bias assessment and methodology bias assessment: 1, 2, 3, 4
- bias assessment and methodology bias assessment risk: 1, 2, 3, 4
- bias assessment and primary study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- bias assessment and related analysis: 1, 2
- bias assessment and varied number: 1
- bias assessment risk and Evaluation Development Recommendations Assessment GRADE method: 1
- bias assessment risk and GRADE method: 1
- bias assessment risk and high risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- bias assessment risk and methodological tool: 1, 2, 3
- bias assessment risk and methodology bias assessment: 1, 2, 3, 4
- bias assessment risk and methodology bias assessment risk: 1, 2, 3, 4
- bias assessment risk and primary study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- bias assessment risk and related analysis: 1, 2, 3
- bias high risk and evidence appraisal: 1, 2
- bias high risk and GRADE method: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date