545 Assessing the Impact Of COVID-19 On the Diagnosis and Management of Bladder Cancer in The United Kingdom – The West Midlands Experience

Desai, C; Ehsanullah, S A; Khashaba, S

INTRODUCTION: The British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) issued an interim strategy for the management of bladder cancer as a contingency measure during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aim to assess the actual implementation of these recommendations and deviation from the standard of care in the West Midlands. METHOD: A questionnaire was devised and sent to bladder cancer leads of 12 NHS Trusts in the region in June 2020. Responses were analysed and compared with the BAUS COVID-19 strategy. RESULTS: 11 centres were aware of the BAUS COVID-19 strategy. 2 centres were offering teleconsultations only for 2-week-wait referrals, and 6 centres had changed their practice for non-visible haematuria referrals. All centres were offering TURBTs for new and high-risk tumours. 8 centres had clear MDT documentation of NICE risk-stratifications of all bladder tumours and 10 centres were also documenting any changes in treatment. Only 7 centres continued to give BCG to newly diagnosed NMIBC. All centres continued with staging CT for newly diagnosed MIBC. Patients were still being referred for cystectomies, however few were performed. Radiation as curative and palliative intent continued. Of the 5 regional cancer centres, only 1 continued with cystectomies as normal, whereas 2 performed the procedure on a case-by-case basis, and the procedure was delayed/deferred in the other 2 centres. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostics, and definitive management of bladder cancer has been severely affected by COVID-19. In particular, deferred intravesical BCG and delayed radical treatment can have a dire impact on the long-term outcomes of the patients presenting during the pandemic.