Selected article for: "chain reaction and RT PCR method"

Author: Wintjens, Anne G. W. E.; Hintzen, Kim F. H.; Engelen, Sanne M. E.; Lubbers, Tim; Savelkoul, Paul H. M.; Wesseling, Geertjan; van der Palen, Job A. M.; Bouvy, Nicole D.
Title: Applying the electronic nose for pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening
  • Cord-id: 9uft32bq
  • Document date: 2020_12_2
  • ID: 9uft32bq
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Infection with SARS-CoV-2 causes corona virus disease (COVID-19). The most standard diagnostic method is reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal and/or an oropharyngeal swab. The high occurrence of false-negative results due to the non-presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the oropharyngeal environment renders this sampling method not ideal. Therefore, a new sampling device is desirable. This proof-of-principle study investigated the possibility to train mach
    Document: BACKGROUND: Infection with SARS-CoV-2 causes corona virus disease (COVID-19). The most standard diagnostic method is reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal and/or an oropharyngeal swab. The high occurrence of false-negative results due to the non-presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the oropharyngeal environment renders this sampling method not ideal. Therefore, a new sampling device is desirable. This proof-of-principle study investigated the possibility to train machine-learning classifiers with an electronic nose (Aeonose) to differentiate between COVID-19-positive and negative persons based on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) analysis. METHODS: Between April and June 2020, participants were invited for breath analysis when a swab for RT-PCR was collected. If the RT-PCR resulted negative, the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies was checked to confirm the negative result. All participants breathed through the Aeonose for five minutes. This device contains metal-oxide sensors that change in conductivity upon reaction with VOCs in exhaled breath. These conductivity changes are input data for machine learning and used for pattern recognition. The result is a value between − 1 and + 1, indicating the infection probability. RESULTS: 219 participants were included, 57 of which COVID-19 positive. A sensitivity of 0.86 and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.92 were found. Adding clinical variables to machine-learning classifier via multivariate logistic regression analysis, the NPV improved to 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: The Aeonose can distinguish COVID-19 positive from negative participants based on VOC patterns in exhaled breath with a high NPV. The Aeonose might be a promising, non-invasive, and low-cost triage tool for excluding SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients elected for surgery.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • absence presence and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • absence presence and logistic regression analysis multivariate: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • absence presence and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • absence presence and logistic regression random forest: 1, 2
    • acute copd exacerbation and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute copd exacerbation and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2
    • acute copd exacerbation and logistic regression analysis multivariate: 1
    • acute copd exacerbation and logistic regression model: 1
    • logistic regression analysis and low dropout: 1
    • logistic regression and low dropout: 1
    • logistic regression and machine learn: 1
    • logistic regression model and machine learn: 1