Author: Safeek, Rachel; Hill, Tamsey; Hendricks, Arthur; Underwood, David; Washington, Mary; Guidici, Jessica; Wong, Tammy; Gerardo, Charles; Hicks, Charles; McKellar, Mehri
Title: Testing for HIV infection in the emergency departments of 2 hospitals in the Southeastern United States Cord-id: 4t9wz4x5 Document date: 2020_5_26
ID: 4t9wz4x5
Snippet: BACKGROUND: In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended nonâ€targeted, optâ€out HIV screening in all healthcare settings, including emergency departments (EDs). Multiple HIV testing programs have been implemented in EDs across the United States with varying designs and testing platforms. We report findings from a free, nonâ€targeted, rapid HIV testing program in 2 EDs in the Southeastern United States. METHODS: From 2008 to 2012, adults ≥18 years of age were of
Document: BACKGROUND: In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended nonâ€targeted, optâ€out HIV screening in all healthcare settings, including emergency departments (EDs). Multiple HIV testing programs have been implemented in EDs across the United States with varying designs and testing platforms. We report findings from a free, nonâ€targeted, rapid HIV testing program in 2 EDs in the Southeastern United States. METHODS: From 2008 to 2012, adults ≥18 years of age were offered free rapid HIV testing using an oral swab test (OraQuick ADVANCE Rapid HIVâ€1/2 antibody test) in the EDs of a large academic medical center and an affiliated community hospital in Durham, North Carolina. RESULTS: In total, 5443 ED patients were offered HIV testing. The overall acceptance rate was 66.9% (3639/5443). Younger persons were significantly more likely to accept testing (78.2% for 18–29 years old vs 67.1% for ≥30 years old; P < 0.001) as were Black participants (72.6% Black vs 66.5% White; P < 0.001). Acceptance rates improved significantly after optâ€out oral consent replaced written consent (71.3% vs 63.1%; P < 0.001). Seven new HIV diagnoses were confirmed during the testing program, resulting in a seropositivity rate of 0.19% (7/3639). There were 8 false–positive rapid oral HIV tests (positive predictive value = 46.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of new HIV diagnoses was low, implementation of this rapid, nonâ€targeted ED screening program was feasible with high acceptance rates, particularly after introducing the optâ€out oral consent approach.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acid amplification and acute hiv infection: 1, 2, 3
- acid amplification and low number: 1, 2, 3
- acid amplification and lymph node: 1, 2, 3
- additional benefit and low number: 1
- additional benefit and lymph node: 1, 2
- low number and lymph node: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date