Selected article for: "acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown pandemic"

Author: Trivisano, Marina; Specchio, Nicola; Pietrafusa, Nicola; Calabrese, Costanza; Ferretti, Alessandro; Ricci, Riccardo; Renzetti, Tommaso; Raponi, Massimiliano; Vigevano, Federico
Title: Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric patients with epilepsy – The caregiver perspective
  • Cord-id: 29hls76w
  • Document date: 2020_11_24
  • ID: 29hls76w
    Snippet: The recent COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted care systems around the world. We assessed how the COVID-19 pandemic affected children with epilepsy in Italy, where lockdown measures were applied from March 8 to May 4, 2020. We compiled an Italian-language online survey on changes to healthcare and views on telehealth. Invitations were sent to 6631 contacts of all patients diagnosed with epilepsy within the last 5 years at the BambinoGesù Children’s Hospital in Rome. Of the 3321 responses received
    Document: The recent COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted care systems around the world. We assessed how the COVID-19 pandemic affected children with epilepsy in Italy, where lockdown measures were applied from March 8 to May 4, 2020. We compiled an Italian-language online survey on changes to healthcare and views on telehealth. Invitations were sent to 6631 contacts of all patients diagnosed with epilepsy within the last 5 years at the BambinoGesù Children’s Hospital in Rome. Of the 3321 responses received, 55.6% of patients were seizure-free for at least 1 year before the COVID-19-related lockdown, 74.4% used anti-seizure medications (ASMs), and 59.7% had intellectual disability. Only 10 patients (0.4%) became infected with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Seizure frequency remained stable for most patients during the lockdown period (increased in 13.2%; decreased in 20.3%), and seizure duration, use of rescue medications, and adherence to treatment were unchanged. Comorbidities were more affected (behavioral problems worsened in 35.8%; sleep disorder worsened in 17.0%). Visits were canceled/postponed for 41.0%, but 25.1% had remote consultation during the lockdown period (93.9% were satisfied). Most responders (67.2%) considered continued remote consultations advantageous. Our responses support that patients/caregivers are willing to embrace telemedicine for some scenarios.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute respiratory and lockdown measure: 1, 2, 3
    • acute respiratory and lockdown period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory and lockdown period lockdown: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • acute respiratory and lockdown period lockdown pre: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • acute respiratory and low influence: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute respiratory and low utilization: 1
    • local spread and lockdown period: 1, 2
    • lockdown period and low influence: 1
    • lockdown period and low utilization: 1
    • lockdown period lockdown and low utilization: 1