Author: Hernándezâ€Huerta, MarÃa Teresa; Pérezâ€Campos Mayoral, Laura; Sánchez Navarro, Luis Manuel; Mayoralâ€Andrade, Gabriel; Pérezâ€Campos Mayoral, Eduardo; Zenteno, Edgar; Pérezâ€Campos, Eduardo
Title: Should RTâ€PCR be considered a gold standard in the diagnosis of COVIDâ€19? Cord-id: 3zwe1yvn Document date: 2020_7_14
ID: 3zwe1yvn
Snippet: In reference to the comments by Dramé M., et al., 2020, that question the possibility of whether the reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) for viral load should be considered a gold standard in the diagnosis of Covid-19. They justify this doubt due to its sensitivity, which only reaches 38%, and is certainly no better than luck. However, in the cited publication by Liu K., et al., 2020, Hainan, China, it does not specify RT-PCR sensitivity. This article is protected by copyri
Document: In reference to the comments by Dramé M., et al., 2020, that question the possibility of whether the reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) for viral load should be considered a gold standard in the diagnosis of Covid-19. They justify this doubt due to its sensitivity, which only reaches 38%, and is certainly no better than luck. However, in the cited publication by Liu K., et al., 2020, Hainan, China, it does not specify RT-PCR sensitivity. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date