Selected article for: "median duration and symptom onset"

Author: Olearo, Flaminia; Nörz, Dominik; Heinrich, Fabian; Sutter, Jan Peter; Rödel, Kevin; Schultze, Alexander; Wiesch, Julian Schulze Zur; Braun, Platon; Oesterreich, Lisa; Kreuels, Benno; Wichmann, Dominic; Aepfelbacher, Martin; Pfefferle, Susanne; Lütgehetmann, Marc
Title: Handling and accuracy of four rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 compared to RT-qPCR
  • Cord-id: 3esir87x
  • Document date: 2021_3_3
  • ID: 3esir87x
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostics is facing material shortages and long turnaround times due to exponential increase of testing demand. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the analytic performance and handling of four rapid Antigen Point of Care Tests (AgPOCTs) I-IV (Distributors: (I) Roche, (II) Abbott, (III) MEDsan and (IV) Siemens). METHODS: 100 RT-PCR negative and 84 RT-PCR positive oropharyngeal swabs were prospectively collected and used to determine performance and accuracy of these AgPOCT
    Document: BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostics is facing material shortages and long turnaround times due to exponential increase of testing demand. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the analytic performance and handling of four rapid Antigen Point of Care Tests (AgPOCTs) I-IV (Distributors: (I) Roche, (II) Abbott, (III) MEDsan and (IV) Siemens). METHODS: 100 RT-PCR negative and 84 RT-PCR positive oropharyngeal swabs were prospectively collected and used to determine performance and accuracy of these AgPOCTs. Handling was evaluated by 10 healthcare workers/users through a questionnaire. RESULTS: The median duration from symptom onset to sampling was 6 days (IQR 2-12 days). The overall respective sensitivity were 49.4% (CI95%: 38.9 - 59.9), 44.6% (CI95%: 34.3 - 55.3), 45.8% (CI95%: 35.5 - 56.5) and 54.9% (CI95%: 43.4-65.9) for tests I, II, III and IV, respectively. In the high viral load subgroup (containing >10(6) copies of SARS-CoV-2 /swab, n = 26), AgPOCTs reached sensitivities of 92.3% or more (range 92.3% - 100%). Specificity was 100% for tests I, II (CI95%: 96.3 – 100 for both tests) and IV (CI95%: 96.3 - 100) and 97% (CI95%: 91.5 - 98.9) for test III. Regarding handling, test I obtained the overall highest scores, while test II was considered to have the most convenient components. Of note, users considered all assays, with the exception of test I, to pose a significant risk for contamination by drips or spills. DISCUSSION: Besides some differences in sensitivity and handling, all four AgPOCTs showed acceptable performance in high viral load samples. However, due to the significantly lower sensitivity compared to RT-qPCR, a careful consideration of pro and cons of AgPOCT has to be taken into account before clinical implementation.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • absolute quantification and acceptable performance: 1
    • absolute quantification and lod detection limit: 1, 2, 3
    • acceptable accuracy and lod detection limit: 1
    • acceptable performance and load sample: 1
    • acceptable performance and lod detection limit: 1