Selected article for: "case fatality rate and high case fatality rate"

Author: Elsawah, Hozaifa Khalil; Elsokary, Mohamed Ahmed; Elrazzaz, Mahmoud Gamal; ElShafey, Ahmed Hane
Title: Hydroxychloroquine for treatment of non‐severe COVID‐19 patients; systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled clinical trials
  • Cord-id: 4qpk99x9
  • Document date: 2020_8_18
  • ID: 4qpk99x9
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Being a pandemic and having a high global case fatality rate directed us to assess the evidence strength of hydroxychloroquine efficacy in treating COVID‐19 arising from clinical trials and to update the practice with the most reliable clinical evidence. METHODS: A comprehensive search was started in June up to July‐18, 2020 in many databases, including PubMed, Embase and others. Of 432 studies found, only six studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria which includes: clinical tria
    Document: BACKGROUND: Being a pandemic and having a high global case fatality rate directed us to assess the evidence strength of hydroxychloroquine efficacy in treating COVID‐19 arising from clinical trials and to update the practice with the most reliable clinical evidence. METHODS: A comprehensive search was started in June up to July‐18, 2020 in many databases, including PubMed, Embase and others. Of 432 studies found, only six studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria which includes: clinical trials, age>12 years with non‐severe COVID‐19, PCR‐confirmed COVID‐19, hydroxychloroquine is the intervention beyond the usual care. Data extraction and bias risk assessment were done by two independent authors. Both fixed‐effect and random‐effect models were utilized for pooling data using risk difference as a summary measure. The primary outcomes are clinical and radiological COVID‐19 progression, SARS‐CoV‐2 clearance in the pharyngeal swab, and mortality. The secondary outcomes are the adverse effects of hydroxychloroquine. RESULTS: Among 609 COVID‐19 confirmed patients obtained from pooling 6 studies, 294 patients received Hydroxychloroquine and 315 patients served as a control. Hydroxychloroquine significantly prevent early radiological progression relative to control with risk difference and 95% confidence interval of ‐0.2 (‐0.36 to ‐0.03). On the other hand, hydroxychloroquine did not prevent clinical COVID‐19 progression, reduce 5‐days mortality, or enhance viral clearance on days 5, 6, 7. Moreover, many adverse effects were reported with hydroxychloroquine therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Failure of hydroxychloroquine to show viral clearance or clinical benefits with additional adverse effects outweigh its protective effect from radiological progression in non‐severe COVID‐19 patients. Benefit‐risk balance should guide hydroxychloroquine use in COVID‐19. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abstract title and low number: 1, 2, 3
    • abstract title and low quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
    • abstract title and low quality study: 1
    • abstract title screen and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2
    • abstract title screen and low quality: 1, 2
    • accurate result and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2
    • accurate result and low number: 1
    • acute respiratory syndrome and loading dose: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • acute respiratory syndrome and long follow period: 1, 2, 3
    • acute respiratory syndrome and low number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory syndrome and low quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory syndrome and low quality study: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory syndrome and lung abnormality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • loading dose and low number: 1, 2, 3
    • loading dose and low quality: 1
    • long follow period and low number: 1
    • low quality and lung abnormality: 1
    • low quality study and lung abnormality: 1