Author: Elsawah, Hozaifa Khalil; Elsokary, Mohamed Ahmed; Elrazzaz, Mahmoud Gamal; ElShafey, Ahmed Hane
Title: Hydroxychloroquine for treatment of nonâ€severe COVIDâ€19 patients; systematic review and metaâ€analysis of controlled clinical trials Cord-id: 4qpk99x9 Document date: 2020_8_18
ID: 4qpk99x9
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Being a pandemic and having a high global case fatality rate directed us to assess the evidence strength of hydroxychloroquine efficacy in treating COVIDâ€19 arising from clinical trials and to update the practice with the most reliable clinical evidence. METHODS: A comprehensive search was started in June up to Julyâ€18, 2020 in many databases, including PubMed, Embase and others. Of 432 studies found, only six studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria which includes: clinical tria
Document: BACKGROUND: Being a pandemic and having a high global case fatality rate directed us to assess the evidence strength of hydroxychloroquine efficacy in treating COVIDâ€19 arising from clinical trials and to update the practice with the most reliable clinical evidence. METHODS: A comprehensive search was started in June up to Julyâ€18, 2020 in many databases, including PubMed, Embase and others. Of 432 studies found, only six studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria which includes: clinical trials, age>12 years with nonâ€severe COVIDâ€19, PCRâ€confirmed COVIDâ€19, hydroxychloroquine is the intervention beyond the usual care. Data extraction and bias risk assessment were done by two independent authors. Both fixedâ€effect and randomâ€effect models were utilized for pooling data using risk difference as a summary measure. The primary outcomes are clinical and radiological COVIDâ€19 progression, SARSâ€CoVâ€2 clearance in the pharyngeal swab, and mortality. The secondary outcomes are the adverse effects of hydroxychloroquine. RESULTS: Among 609 COVIDâ€19 confirmed patients obtained from pooling 6 studies, 294 patients received Hydroxychloroquine and 315 patients served as a control. Hydroxychloroquine significantly prevent early radiological progression relative to control with risk difference and 95% confidence interval of â€0.2 (â€0.36 to â€0.03). On the other hand, hydroxychloroquine did not prevent clinical COVIDâ€19 progression, reduce 5â€days mortality, or enhance viral clearance on days 5, 6, 7. Moreover, many adverse effects were reported with hydroxychloroquine therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Failure of hydroxychloroquine to show viral clearance or clinical benefits with additional adverse effects outweigh its protective effect from radiological progression in nonâ€severe COVIDâ€19 patients. Benefitâ€risk balance should guide hydroxychloroquine use in COVIDâ€19. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abstract title and low number: 1, 2, 3
- abstract title and low quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- abstract title and low quality study: 1
- abstract title screen and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2
- abstract title screen and low quality: 1, 2
- accurate result and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2
- accurate result and low number: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and loading dose: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- acute respiratory syndrome and long follow period: 1, 2, 3
- acute respiratory syndrome and low number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute respiratory syndrome and low quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute respiratory syndrome and low quality study: 1, 2
- acute respiratory syndrome and lung abnormality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- loading dose and low number: 1, 2, 3
- loading dose and low quality: 1
- long follow period and low number: 1
- low quality and lung abnormality: 1
- low quality study and lung abnormality: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date