Author: Stanevich, O. V.; Fomina, D. S.; Bakulin, I. G.; Galeev, S. I.; Bakin, E. A.; Belash, V. A.; Kulikov, A. N.; Lebedeva, A. A.; Lioznov, D. A.; Polushin, Y. S.; Shlyk, I. V.; Vorobyev, E. A.; Vorobyeva, S. V.; Surovceva, T. V.; Bakulina, N. V.; Lysenko, M. A.; Moiseev, I. S.
Title: Ruxolitinib versus Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Adults with Covid-19: multicenter matched-controlled study Cord-id: 3gaywrk6 Document date: 2021_4_20
ID: 3gaywrk6
Snippet: Background: Several anti-cytokine therapies were tested in the randomized trials in hospitalized patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection (COVID-19). Both janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, baricitinib, and dexamethasone demonstrated the reduction of mortality. In this matched control study we compared dexamethasone to another JAK inhibitor, ruxolitinib. Methods: The study included 146 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and oxygen support requirement. The control group
Document: Background: Several anti-cytokine therapies were tested in the randomized trials in hospitalized patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection (COVID-19). Both janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, baricitinib, and dexamethasone demonstrated the reduction of mortality. In this matched control study we compared dexamethasone to another JAK inhibitor, ruxolitinib. Methods: The study included 146 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and oxygen support requirement. The control group was selected 1:1 from 1355 dexamethasone-treated patients and was matched by 29 clinical and laboratory parameters predicting survival. Results: Ruxolitinib treatment in the general cohort of patients was associated with equivalent to dexamethasone mortality rate: 9,6% (95% CI 4,6-14,6%) vs 13,0% (95% CI 7,5-18,5%, superiority p=0.35, non-inferiority p=0.0137), respectively. Time to discharge without oxygen support requirement was also not different between these groups: 13 vs 11 days (p=0.13). Subgroup analysis without adjustment for multiple comparisons demonstrated reduced mortality in ruxolitnib-treated patients with febrile fever (OR 0.33, 95%CI 0.11-1.00). Except higher incidence of grade 1 thrombocytopenia (37% vs 23%, p=0.042), ruxolitinib therapy was associated with better safety profile due to reduced rate of severe cardiovascular adverse events (6.8% vs 15%, p=0.025). Conclusions: Ruxolitinib may be an alternative anti-cytokine therapy with comparable efficacy in patients with potential risks of steroid administration. Patients with febrile fever at admission may benefit from ruxolitinib administration. Funding: Ruxolitinib was obtained from Novartis through Managed Access Program (MAP).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abnormal liver and active treatment: 1
- abnormal liver and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1
- abnormal liver and liver disorder: 1
- abnormal liver function and active treatment: 1
- abnormal liver function and liver disorder: 1
- absolute lymphocyte and active treatment: 1, 2, 3
- absolute lymphocyte and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4
- absolute lymphocyte and acute gvhd: 1, 2, 3
- absolute lymphocyte count and active treatment: 1, 2, 3
- absolute lymphocyte count and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1, 2
- absolute lymphocyte count and acute gvhd: 1, 2, 3
- academic study and active treatment: 1
- academic study and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4
- academic study and acute myocardial infarction: 1
- academic study and acute renal injury: 1
- active treatment and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4
- active treatment and acute myocardial infarction: 1, 2, 3
- active treatment and acute renal injury: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date