Selected article for: "outcome measure and primary outcome measure"

Author: Hall, Nigel J; Eaton, Simon; Sherratt, Frances C; Reading, Isabel; Walker, Erin; Chorozoglou, Maria; Beasant, Lucy; Wood, Wendy; Stanton, Michael; Corbett, Harriet; Rex, Dean; Hutchings, Natalie; Dixon, Elizabeth; Grist, Simon; Crawley, Esther M; Young, Bridget; Blazeby, Jane M
Title: CONservative TReatment of Appendicitis in Children: a randomised controlled feasibility Trial (CONTRACT)
  • Cord-id: 8vue00p6
  • Document date: 2021_1_13
  • ID: 8vue00p6
    Snippet: OBJECTIVE: To establish the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a non-operative treatment pathway compared with appendicectomy in children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. DESIGN: Feasibility randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study to inform recruiter training to optimise recruitment and the design of a future definitive trial. SETTING: Three specialist paediatric surgery centres in the UK. PATIE
    Document: OBJECTIVE: To establish the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a non-operative treatment pathway compared with appendicectomy in children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. DESIGN: Feasibility randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study to inform recruiter training to optimise recruitment and the design of a future definitive trial. SETTING: Three specialist paediatric surgery centres in the UK. PATIENTS: Children (aged 4–15 years) with a clinical diagnosis of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. INTERVENTIONS: Appendicectomy or a non-operative treatment pathway (comprising broad-spectrum antibiotics and active observation). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was the proportion of eligible patients recruited. Secondary outcomes evaluated adherence to interventions, data collection during follow-up, safety of treatment pathways and clinical course. RESULTS: Fifty per cent of eligible participants (95% CI 40 to 59) approached about the trial agreed to participate and were randomised. Repeated bespoke recruiter training was associated with an increase in recruitment rate over the course of the trial from 38% to 72%. There was high acceptance of randomisation, good patient and surgeon adherence to trial procedures and satisfactory completion of follow-up. Although more participants had perforated appendicitis than had been anticipated, treatment pathways were found to be safe and adverse event profiles acceptable. CONCLUSION: Recruitment to a randomised controlled trial examining the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a non-operative treatment pathway compared with appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15830435.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abdominal pain and acceptable good: 1
    • abdominal pain and acute appendicitis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • abdominal pain and acutely present: 1
    • abdominal pain fever and acute appendicitis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • abdominal pain present and acute appendicitis: 1, 2
    • acceptable good and acute appendicitis: 1