Author: Lauridsen, M. D.; Butt, J. H.; Østergaard, L.; Møller, J. E.; Hassager, C.; Gerds, T.; Kragholm, K.; Phelps, M.; Schou, M.; Torp-Pedersen, C.; Gislason, G.; Køber, L.; Fosbøl, E. L.
Title: Incidence of acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock during corona virus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic Cord-id: ablfelud Document date: 2020_10_13
ID: ablfelud
Snippet: Aims The hospitalization of patients with MI has decreased during global lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Whether this decrease is associated with more severe MI, e.g. MI-CS, is unknown. We aimed to examine the association of Corona virus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and incidence of acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (MI-CS). Methods On March 11, 2020, the Danish government announced national lock-down. Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients hospitalized
Document: Aims The hospitalization of patients with MI has decreased during global lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Whether this decrease is associated with more severe MI, e.g. MI-CS, is unknown. We aimed to examine the association of Corona virus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and incidence of acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (MI-CS). Methods On March 11, 2020, the Danish government announced national lock-down. Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients hospitalized with MI-CS. Incidence rates (IR) and incidence rate ratios (IRR) were used to compare MI-CS before and after March 11 in 2015-2019 and in 2020. Results We identified 11,769 patients with MI of whom 696 (5.9%) had cardiogenic shock in 2015-2019. In 2020, 2,132 MI patients were identified of whom 119 had cardiogenic shock (5.6%). The IR per 100,000 person years before March 11 in 2015-2019 was 9.2 (95% CI: 8.3-10.2) and after 8.9 (95% CI: 8.0-9.9). In 2020, the IR was 7.5 (95% CI: 5.8-9.7) before March 11 and 7.7 (95% CI: 6.0-9.9) after. The IRRs comparing the 2020-period with the 2015-2019 period before and after March 11 (lockdown) were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.59-1.12) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.57-1.32), respectively. The IRR comparing the 2020-period during and before lockdown was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.74-1.41). No difference in 7-day mortality or in-hospital management was observed between study periods. Conclusion We could not identify a significant association of the national lockdown on the incidence of MI-CS, along with similar in-hospital management and mortality in patients with MI-CS.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absolute mortality and admission day: 1
- absolute mortality and admission day death: 1
- acute heart failure and admission day: 1, 2, 3, 4
- acute heart failure and liver disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- acute heart failure and lockdown period: 1, 2, 3
- acute mi myocardial infarction and lockdown period: 1
- acute mi myocardial infarction reduction and lockdown period: 1
- acute respiratory distress and admission day: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute respiratory distress and admission day death: 1, 2, 3, 4
- acute respiratory distress and liver disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute respiratory distress and lockdown period: 1
- admission day and liver disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- admission day and lockdown period: 1
- liver disease and lockdown period: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date