Selected article for: "italian population and psychological impact"

Author: Rossi, Rodolfo; Socci, Valentina; Pacitti, Francesca; Mensi, Sonia; Di Marco, Antinisca; Siracusano, Alberto; Di Lorenzo, Giorgio
Title: Mental Health Outcomes Among Healthcare Workers and the General Population During the COVID-19 in Italy
  • Cord-id: 2kycfcfc
  • Document date: 2020_12_8
  • ID: 2kycfcfc
    Snippet: INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers in Italy have been exposed to an unprecedented pressure and traumatic events. However, no direct comparison with the general population is available so far. The aim of this study is to detail mental health outcomes in healthcare workers compared to the general population. METHODS: 24050 respondents completed an on-line questionnaire during the contagion peak, 21342 general population, 1295 second-line healthcare workers, and 1411 fro
    Document: INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers in Italy have been exposed to an unprecedented pressure and traumatic events. However, no direct comparison with the general population is available so far. The aim of this study is to detail mental health outcomes in healthcare workers compared to the general population. METHODS: 24050 respondents completed an on-line questionnaire during the contagion peak, 21342 general population, 1295 second-line healthcare workers, and 1411 front-line healthcare workers. Depressive, anxious, post-traumatic symptoms and insomnia were assessed. Specific COVID-19 related potential risk factors were also considered in healthcare workers. RESULTS: Depressive symptoms were more frequent in the general population (28.12%) and front-line healthcare workers (28.35%) compared to the second-line healthcare workers (19.98%) groups. Anxiety symptoms showed a prevalence of 21.25% in the general population, 18.05% for second-line healthcare workers, and 20.55% for front-line healthcare workers. Insomnia showed a prevalence of 7.82, 6.58, and 9.92% for the general population, second-line healthcare workers, and front-line healthcare workers, respectively. Compared to the general population, front-line healthcare workers had higher odds of endorsing total trauma-related symptoms. Both second-line healthcare workers and front-line healthcare workers had higher odds of endorsing core post-traumatic symptoms compared to the general population, while second-line healthcare workers had lower odds of endorsing negative affect and dissociative symptoms. Higher total traumatic symptom score was associated with being a front-line healthcare worker, having a colleague infected, hospitalized, or deceased, being a nurse, female gender, and younger age. CONCLUSION: This study suggests a significant psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Italian general population and healthcare workers. Front-line healthcare workers represent a specific at-risk population for post-traumatic symptoms. These findings underline the importance of monitoring and intervention strategies.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute phase and address aim: 1
    • acute phase and adjusted model: 1, 2, 3
    • acute phase and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • address aim and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • adjusted model and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • adjusted model and logistic regression estimate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • lockdown beginning and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • lockdown measure and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • lockdown measure and logistic regression estimate: 1