Selected article for: "global public health and infectious disease"

Author: Man, Milena Adina; Toma, Claudia; Motoc, Nicoleta Stefania; Necrelescu, Octavia Luiza; Bondor, Cosmina Ioana; Chis, Ana Florica; Lesan, Andrei; Pop, Carmen Monica; Todea, Doina Adina; Dantes, Elena; Puiu, Ruxandra; Rajnoveanu, Ruxandra-Mioara
Title: Disease Perception and Coping with Emotional Distress During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey Among Medical Staff
  • Cord-id: 5nzni4k1
  • Document date: 2020_7_7
  • ID: 5nzni4k1
    Snippet: The novel coronavirus disease, COVID-19, is a highly contagious infectious disease declared by the World Health Organization to be a pandemic and a global public health emergency. During outbreaks, health care workers are submitted to an enormous emotional burden as they must balance the fundamental “duty to treat” with their parallel duties to family and loved ones. The aims of our study were to evaluate disease perceptions, levels of stress, emotional distress, and coping strategies among
    Document: The novel coronavirus disease, COVID-19, is a highly contagious infectious disease declared by the World Health Organization to be a pandemic and a global public health emergency. During outbreaks, health care workers are submitted to an enormous emotional burden as they must balance the fundamental “duty to treat” with their parallel duties to family and loved ones. The aims of our study were to evaluate disease perceptions, levels of stress, emotional distress, and coping strategies among medical staff (COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 departments) in a tertiary pulmonology teaching hospital in the first month after the outbreak of COVID-19. One hundred and fifteen health care workers completed four validated questionnaires (the brief illness perception questionnaire, perceived stress scale, the profile of emotional distress emotional, and the cognitive coping evaluation questionnaire) that were afterwards interpreted by one psychologist. There was a high level of stress and psychological distress among health care workers in the first month after the pandemic outbreak. Interestingly, there were no differences between persons that worked in COVID-19 departments versus those working in non-COVID-19 departments. Disease perceptions and coping mechanisms were similar in the two groups. As coping mechanisms, refocusing on planning and positive reappraisal were used more than in the general population. There is no difference in disease perceptions, levels of stress, emotional distress, and coping strategies in medical staff handling COVID-19 patients versus those staff who were not handling COVID-19 patients in the first month after the pandemic outbreak.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • action thought and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2
    • actual risk and acute respiratory: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • actual risk and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • actual risk and long change: 1
    • acute respiratory and additional questionnaire: 1
    • acute respiratory and adequate protection equipment: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute respiratory and little disease know: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory and lived situation: 1
    • acute respiratory and local ethics: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute respiratory and local ethics committee: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute respiratory syndrome and adequate protection equipment: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute respiratory syndrome and little disease know: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory syndrome and lived situation: 1
    • acute respiratory syndrome and local ethics: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute respiratory syndrome and local ethics committee: 1, 2, 3, 4