Structured Reporting in Portable Chest Radiographs: An Essential Tool in the Diagnosis of COVID-19

Yates, Andrew; Dempsey, Philip J.; Vencken, Sebastian; MacMahon, Peter J.; Hutchinson, Barry D.

PURPOSE: To date, the majority of chest imaging studies in COVID-19 pneumonia have focused on CT. Evidence for the utility of chest radiographs (CXR) in this population is less robust. Our objectives were to develop a systematic approach for reporting likelihood of COVID-19 pneumonia on chest CXR, to measure the interobserver variability of this approach and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CXR compared to real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). METHOD: Retrospective review of patients suspected of having COVID-19 pneumonia who attended our emergency department and underwent both CXR and a RT-PCR were included. Two radiologists reviewed the CXRs, blind to the RT-PCR, and classified them according to a structured reporting template with five categories (Characteristic, High Suspicion, Indeterminate, Unlikely and Normal) which we devised. For analysis of diagnostic accuracy, Characteristic and High Suspicion CXRs were considered positive and the remaining categories negative. Concordance between the two assessors was also assessed. RESULTS: Of 582 patients (51 +/- 20 years), 143/582 (24.6%) had a positive RT-PCR. The absolute concordance between the two assessors was 71.1% (414/582) with a Fleiss-Cohen-weighted Cohen’s κ of 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.85). A patient with a positive CXR had an 88% (95% CI 80-96%) probability of having a positive RT-PCR during a period of high incidence, early in the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: Using a structured approach, a positive CXR had a high likelihood of predicting a positive RT-PCR, with good interrater reliability. CXR can be useful in identifying new cases of COVID-19.