Author: Wang, J. G.; Liu, B.; Percha, B.; Pan, S.; Goel, N.; Mathews, K.; Gao, C.; Tandon, P.; Tomlinson, M.; Yoo, E.; Howell, D.; Eisenberg, E.; Naymagon, L.; Tremblay, D.; Chokshi, K.; Dua, S.; Dunn, A.; Powell, C.; Bose, S.
Title: Cardiovascular disease and severe hypoxemia associated with higher rates of non-invasive respiratory support failure in COVID-19 Cord-id: 5qt588r5 Document date: 2020_9_29
ID: 5qt588r5
Snippet: Rationale Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) is the major complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), yet optimal respiratory support strategies are uncertain. Objectives To describe outcomes with high-flow oxygen delivered through nasal cannula (HFNC) and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in COVID-19 AHRF and identify individual factors associated with failure. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adults with COVID-19 treated with H
Document: Rationale Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) is the major complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), yet optimal respiratory support strategies are uncertain. Objectives To describe outcomes with high-flow oxygen delivered through nasal cannula (HFNC) and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in COVID-19 AHRF and identify individual factors associated with failure. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adults with COVID-19 treated with HFNC and/or NIPPV to describe rates of success (live discharge without endotracheal intubation (ETI)), and identify characteristics associated with failure (ETI and/or in-hospital mortality) using Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard models. Results A total of 331 and 747 patients received HFNC and NIPPV as the highest level of non-invasive respiratory support, respectively; 154 (46.5%) in the HFNC cohort and 167 (22.4%) in the NIPPV cohort were successfully discharged without requiring ETI. In adjusted models, significantly increased risk of HFNC and NIPPV failure was seen among patients with cardiovascular disease (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 1.82; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17-2.83 and sHR 1.40; 95% CI 1.06-1.84), respectively, and among those with lower oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO2/FiO2) ratio at HFNC and NIPPV initiation (sHR, 0.32; 95% CI 0.19-0.54, and sHR 0.34; 95% CI 0.21-0.55, respectively). Conclusions A significant proportion of patients receiving non-invasive respiratory modalities for COVID-19 AHRF achieved successful discharge without requiring ETI, with lower success rates among those with cardiovascular disease or more severe hypoxia. The role of non-invasive respiratory modalities in COVID-19 related AHRF requires further consideration.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- academic health and admission day: 1, 2, 3
- academic health and admission time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- academic health and live discharge: 1
- academic health and longitudinal cohort: 1, 2
- academic health and longitudinal cohort study: 1, 2
- academic health and lung injury: 1
- academic health system and acute ahrf hypoxemic respiratory failure: 1
- academic health system and admission day: 1, 2
- academic health system and admission time: 1, 2, 3, 4
- academic health system and live discharge: 1
- academic health system and lung injury: 1
- acute ahrf hypoxemic respiratory failure and admission time: 1, 2
- acute respiratory illness and admission day: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- acute respiratory illness and admission time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- acute respiratory illness and longitudinal cohort: 1, 2
- acute respiratory illness and longitudinal cohort study: 1
- acute respiratory illness and lung injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- acute respiratory illness development and lung injury: 1, 2
- admission time and longitudinal cohort: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date