Selected article for: "acute respiratory distress syndrome and influenza virus"

Author: Pieri, Marina; Donatelli, Vittoria; Calabrò, Maria Grazia; Scandroglio, Anna Mara; Pappalardo, Federico; Zangrillo, Alberto
Title: Eleven years of VV ECMO for ARDS: from H1N1 to SARS-COV-2. Experience and perspectives of a national referral center
  • Cord-id: 3ykn4v82
  • Document date: 2021_9_24
  • ID: 3ykn4v82
    Snippet: Objective Despite growing expertise and wide application of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) of different origin and during pandemics (H1N1 Influenza A virus and SARS-CoV2), large reports are few and pertain mostly to multicentre registries, while randomized trials are difficult to perform. The aim of this study was to report outcomes, trends and innovations of VV ECMO treatment over the last eleven years. Design, s
    Document: Objective Despite growing expertise and wide application of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) of different origin and during pandemics (H1N1 Influenza A virus and SARS-CoV2), large reports are few and pertain mostly to multicentre registries, while randomized trials are difficult to perform. The aim of this study was to report outcomes, trends and innovations of VV ECMO treatment over the last eleven years. Design, setting and participants Observational study on 142 patients treated at the IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital in Milan from June 2009 (year of the H1N1 pandemic) to May 2020 (SARS-CoV-2 pandemic). Interventions None. Measurements and main results The main causes of ARDS were H1N1 pneumonia in 36% of patients, bacterial pneumonia in 17% and Sars-CoV-2 in 9%. Seventy-two percent of patients were centralized from remote hospitals, of which 33% had implanted VV ECMO before transport. The most common cannulation strategy was the dual lumen catheter cannulation system (55%) and anticoagulation was performed with bivalirudin in most patients (79%). Refractory hypoxia was treated with iv beta-blockers (64%), nitric oxide (20%) and pronation (8%). Almost one third of patients (32%) were extubated while on ECMO. Forty-nine percent of patients were discharged from intensive care unit and hospital discharge was 46%: survival was lower in patients requiring VV ECMO for more than 3 weeks compared to lower support duration (23% vs 56%, p=0.007). Anticoagulation with bivalirudin was associated with higher survival compared to heparin (55% vs 31%, p=0.03) and lower thrombocytopenia incidence (69% vs 35%, p=0.003). Conclusion VV ECMO is the pivotal rescue treatment for refractory ARDS: timely treatment and optimal care are needed to optimize therapy, since duration of support is associated with outcome. Anticoagulation with bivalirudin may improve outcome.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abdominal surgery and lung function: 1, 2, 3
    • abdominal surgery and lung injury: 1, 2, 3
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and low survival rate: 1
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and lung function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and lung injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and lung injury reduce: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • acute physiology and low survival rate: 1
    • acute physiology and lung function: 1, 2
    • acute physiology and lung injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute physiology score and low survival rate: 1
    • acute physiology score and lung function: 1
    • acute physiology score and lung injury: 1
    • local ethical committee and lung injury: 1