Selected article for: "health care and high quality"

Author: Lozada-Martínez, Ivan David; Acevedo-Aguilar, Laura Marcela; Mass-Hernández, Laura Marcela; Matta-Rodríguez, Duván; Jiménez-Filigrana, Jhoyner Alberto; Garzón-Gutiérrez, Karen Elizabeth; Barahona-Botache, Sergio Antonio; Vásquez-Castañeda, Danna Lianeth; Caicedo-Giraldo, Sharon del Rosario; Rahman, Sabrina
Title: Practical guide for the use of medical evidence in scientific publication: Recommendations for the medical student: Narrative review
  • Cord-id: 2uulqglp
  • Document date: 2021_10_9
  • ID: 2uulqglp
    Snippet: Currently, the adaptation of scientific evidence in clinical problem solving is based on the evidence-based medicine method. Medical students and health professionals should have an adequate knowledge of this method and thus provide adequate health care and increasingly provide high quality scientific publications that can be subsequently integrated in different clinical scenarios. Several scales and tools have been proposed as guides to recognize the different levels of quality of the available
    Document: Currently, the adaptation of scientific evidence in clinical problem solving is based on the evidence-based medicine method. Medical students and health professionals should have an adequate knowledge of this method and thus provide adequate health care and increasingly provide high quality scientific publications that can be subsequently integrated in different clinical scenarios. Several scales and tools have been proposed as guides to recognize the different levels of quality of the available evidence, their degrees of recommendation and the biases and fallacies that may occur both in the clinical and research areas, with the aim of identifying the best available evidence. However, few students and professionals are aware of them and make proper use of them. Therefore, it is necessary to synthesize these tools in an understandable and practical way.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • academic community and adequate development: 1
    • academic community and long short: 1, 2
    • academic community and low quality: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • academic content and low quality: 1