Selected article for: "different disease course and disease course"

Author: Hasanoglu, Imran; Korukluoglu, Gulay; Asilturk, Dilek; Cosgun, Yasemin; Kalem, Ayse Kaya; Altas, AyÅŸe Basak; Kayaaslan, Bircan; Eser, Fatma; Kuzucu, Esra Akkan; Guner, Rahmet
Title: Higher viral loads in asymptomatic COVID-19 patients might be the invisible part of the iceberg
  • Cord-id: 60sbhzfs
  • Document date: 2020_11_24
  • ID: 60sbhzfs
    Snippet: PURPOSE: SARS-CoV-2 virus dynamics in different hosts and different samples and their relationship with disease severity have not been clearly revealed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the viral loads of 6 different sample types (nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal combined, oral cavity, saliva, rectal, urine, and blood) of patients with different ages and clinics, to reveal the relationship between disease course and SARS-CoV-2 viral load, and differences in viral loads of asymptomatic and sympto
    Document: PURPOSE: SARS-CoV-2 virus dynamics in different hosts and different samples and their relationship with disease severity have not been clearly revealed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the viral loads of 6 different sample types (nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal combined, oral cavity, saliva, rectal, urine, and blood) of patients with different ages and clinics, to reveal the relationship between disease course and SARS-CoV-2 viral load, and differences in viral loads of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal, oral cavity, saliva, rectal, urine, and blood samples are collected from patients who were hospitalized with diagnosis of COVID-19 on admission. Laboratory analysis were carried out at Public Health Institute of Turkey Virology Reference and Research Laboratory. RESULTS: A total of 360 samples from 60 patients were obtained on admission. Fifteen (25%) of the patients were asymptomatic while 45 (75%) were symptomatic. A significant difference was found between mean ages of asymptomatic vs symptomatic patients (26.4 and 36.4, respectively, p = 0.0248). No PCR positivity were found in blood. Only one asymptomatic patient had positive PCR result for urine sample. Viral loads of asymptomatic patients were found to be significantly higher (p = 0.0141) when compared with symptomatic patients. Viral load had a significant negative trend with increasing age. A significant decrease in viral load was observed with increasing disease severity. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study demonstrates that asymptomatic patients have higher SARSCoV-2 viral loads than symptomatic patients and unlike in the few study in the literature, a significant decrease in viral load of nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal samples was observed with increasing disease severity. Factors associated with poor prognosis are found to be significantly correlated with low viral load.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute phase reactant and lymphocyte neutrophil: 1, 2
    • acute phase reactant and lymphocyte neutrophil ratio: 1
    • acute phase reactant and lymphocyte ratio: 1
    • acute respiratory illness and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • acute respiratory illness and lymphocyte neutrophil: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute respiratory illness and lymphocyte neutrophil ratio: 1, 2, 3
    • acute respiratory illness and lymphocyte ratio: 1, 2, 3
    • admission asymptomatic and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • admission day and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • admission day and lymphocyte neutrophil: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • admission day and lymphocyte neutrophil ratio: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • admission day and lymphocyte ratio: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • admission day difference and lymphocyte count: 1
    • admission illness onset median time and lymphocyte count: 1, 2
    • admission illness onset median time and lymphocyte neutrophil: 1, 2, 3
    • admission illness onset median time and lymphocyte neutrophil ratio: 1, 2
    • admission illness onset median time and lymphocyte ratio: 1, 2, 3
    • liver renal and lymphocyte neutrophil ratio: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • liver renal and lymphocyte ratio: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7