Author: Shaun A Truelove; Orit Abrahim; Chiara Altare; Andrew Azman; Paul B Spiegel
Title: COVID-19: Projecting the impact in Rohingya refugee camps and beyond Document date: 2020_3_30
ID: 6njag0dq_5
Snippet: We used a stochastic Susceptible Exposed Infectious Recovered (SEIR) model to simulate transmission in this population. We simulated epidemics under three potential scenarios with different values of the basic reproductive number, R 0 : 1) a low transmission scenario based on transmission levels in many of the Chinese provinces with elevated isolation and control practices and an R 0 similar to influenza (R 0 =1.5-2.0) 14 ; 2) a moderate transmis.....
Document: We used a stochastic Susceptible Exposed Infectious Recovered (SEIR) model to simulate transmission in this population. We simulated epidemics under three potential scenarios with different values of the basic reproductive number, R 0 : 1) a low transmission scenario based on transmission levels in many of the Chinese provinces with elevated isolation and control practices and an R 0 similar to influenza (R 0 =1.5-2.0) 14 ; 2) a moderate transmission scenario that mirrors estimates in early stages of the outbreak in Wuhan, China (R 0 =2.0-3.0) 15 ; and, 3) a high transmission scenario where we assume that R 0 is increased by a factor of 1.65 (R 0 =3.3-5.0) compared to estimates from open community settings, as was observed during the 2017 diphtheria outbreak. 16 The R 0 in each of these scenarios falls within the 95% confidence interval of the current range of estimates for COVID-19. 17 We assumed an Erlang distributed serial interval (time between the onset of symptoms in infector-infectee pairs) with a mean of 6 days (standard deviation = 4.2). 18 The proportion of infections that result in severe disease was estimated using data from a closed population of contacts in Shenzhen, China, for which complete data on contact, age, test results, symptoms, and initial severity were available. 18 Using a Bayesian binomial model, we estimated the proportion of infections that were severe by 10-year age groups and then applied those estimates to the Kutupalong-Balukhali population to get an overall proportion of infections that will develop into severe disease in the specific population. These estimates do not account for differences in comorbidities, differing attack rates by age due to population mixing characteristics, or various other factors.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- age attack rate and confidence interval: 1, 2, 3, 4
- age attack rate and infector infectee: 1
- age attack rate and Recovered SEIR model: 1
- age attack rate and reproductive number: 1, 2, 3
- age attack rate and SEIR model: 1
- age attack rate and serial interval: 1
- age attack rate and severe disease: 1
- age attack rate and symptom onset: 1
- age attack rate and test result: 1
- age group and attack rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31
- age group and basic reproductive number: 1, 2
- age group and binomial model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- age group and closed population: 1
- age group and community setting: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- age group and confidence interval: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- age group and current range: 1
- age group and different value: 1, 2, 3
- age group and diphtheria outbreak: 1
- age group and early stage: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date