Author: Alfaraj, S.H.; Al-Tawfiq, J.A.; Gautret, P.; Alenazi, M.G.; Asiri, A.Y.; Memish, Z.A.
                    Title: Evaluation of visual triage for screening of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus patients  Cord-id: 4hk736ev  Document date: 2018_8_11
                    ID: 4hk736ev
                    
                    Snippet: The emergence of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in September 2012 in Saudi Arabia had attracted the attention of the global health community. In 2017 the Saudi Ministry of Health released a visual triage system with scoring to alert healthcare workers in emergency departments (EDs) and haemodialysis units for the possibility of occurrence of MERS-CoV infection. We performed a retrospective analysis of this visual score to determine its sensitivity and specificity. The st
                    
                    
                    
                     
                    
                    
                    
                    
                        
                            
                                Document: The emergence of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in September 2012 in Saudi Arabia had attracted the attention of the global health community. In 2017 the Saudi Ministry of Health released a visual triage system with scoring to alert healthcare workers in emergency departments (EDs) and haemodialysis units for the possibility of occurrence of MERS-CoV infection. We performed a retrospective analysis of this visual score to determine its sensitivity and specificity. The study included all cases from 2014 to 2017 in a MERS-CoV referral centre in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. During the study period there were a total of 2435 suspected MERS cases. Of these, 1823 (75%) tested negative and the remaining 25% tested positive for MERS-CoV by PCR assay. The application of the visual triage score found a similar percentage of MERS-CoV and non–MERS-CoV patients, with each score from 0 to 11. The percentage of patients with a cutoff score of ≥4 was 75% in patients with MERS-CoV infection and 85% in patients without MERS-CoV infection (p 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of this cutoff score for MERS-CoV infection were 74.1% and 18.6%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the scoring system were low, and further refinement of the score is needed for better prediction of MERS-CoV infection.
 
  Search related documents: 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents- accuracy ensure and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date