Selected article for: "clinical study and data analysis"

Author: Jacobs, Jeffrey p.; Stammers, Alfred H.; Louis, James St.; Hayanga, J.W. Awori; Firstenberg, Michael S.; Mongero, Linda B.; Tesdahl, Eric A.; Rajagopal, Keshava; Cheema, Faisal H.; Patel, Kirti; Esseghir, Feriel; Coley, Tom; Sestokas, Anthony K.; Slepian, Marvin J.; Badhwar, Vinay
Title: Multi-institutional Analysis of 100 Consecutive Patients with COVID-19 and Severe Pulmonary Compromise Treated with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Outcomes and Trends Over Time
  • Cord-id: 0uvlekpt
  • Document date: 2021_4_27
  • ID: 0uvlekpt
    Snippet: The role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the management of severely ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to evolve. The purpose of this study is to review a multi-institutional clinical experience in 100 consecutive patients, at 20 hospitals, with confirmed COVID-19 supported with ECMO. This analysis includes our first 100 patients with complete data who had confirmed COVID-19 and were supported with ECMO. The first patient in the cohort was placed on
    Document: The role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the management of severely ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to evolve. The purpose of this study is to review a multi-institutional clinical experience in 100 consecutive patients, at 20 hospitals, with confirmed COVID-19 supported with ECMO. This analysis includes our first 100 patients with complete data who had confirmed COVID-19 and were supported with ECMO. The first patient in the cohort was placed on ECMO on March 17, 2020. Differences by the mortality group were assessed using χ(2) tests for categorical variables and Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum tests and Welch’s analysis of variance for continuous variables. The median time on ECMO was 12.0 days (IQR = 8–22 days). All 100 patients have since been separated from ECMO: 50 patients survived and 50 patients died. The rate of survival with veno-venous ECMO was 49 of 96 patients (51%), whereas that with veno-arterial ECMO was 1 of 4 patients (25%). Of 50 survivors, 49 have been discharged from the hospital and 1 remains hospitalized at the ECMO-providing hospital. Survivors were generally younger, with a lower median age (47 versus 56.5 years, p = 0.014). In the 50 surviving patients, adjunctive therapies while on ECMO included intravenous steroids (26), anti-interleukin-6 receptor blockers (26), convalescent plasma (22), remdesivir (21), hydroxychloroquine (20), and prostaglandin (15). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may facilitate salvage and survival of selected critically ill patients with COVID-19. Survivors tend to be younger. Substantial variation exists in the drug treatment of COVID-19, but ECMO offers a reasonable rescue strategy.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and adjunctive drug: 1
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and adjunctive medication: 1
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and adjunctive therapy: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and low median: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • acute care and additional follow: 1, 2
    • acute care and additional gathering: 1
    • acute care and adjunctive therapy: 1
    • acute care and low median: 1, 2
    • acute kidney injury and additional insight: 1
    • acute kidney injury and additional insight provide: 1
    • acute kidney injury and adjunctive therapy: 1, 2
    • acute kidney injury and low median: 1
    • additional patient experience and adjunctive medication: 1