Author: Kim, Tae Yeul; Kim, Ji-Youn; Shim, Hyang Jin; Yun, Sun Ae; Jang, Ja-Hyun; Huh, Hee Jae; Kim, Jong-Won; Lee, Nam Yong
                    Title: Comparison of the PowerChek SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A&B, RSV Multiplex Real-time PCR Kit and BioFire Respiratory Panel 2.1 for simultaneous detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and B, and respiratory syncytial virus  Cord-id: 0etljojf  Document date: 2021_9_28
                    ID: 0etljojf
                    
                    Snippet: The potential co-circulation of SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) could pose an unprecedented challenge to healthcare systems worldwide. Here, we compared the performance of the PowerChek SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A&B, RSV Multiplex Real-time PCR Kit (PowerChek) for simultaneous detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and B, and respiratory syncytial virus with that of BioFire Respiratory Panel 2.1 (RP2.1) using 175 nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens. Positive percent agreem
                    
                    
                    
                     
                    
                    
                    
                    
                        
                            
                                Document: The potential co-circulation of SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) could pose an unprecedented challenge to healthcare systems worldwide. Here, we compared the performance of the PowerChek SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A&B, RSV Multiplex Real-time PCR Kit (PowerChek) for simultaneous detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and B, and respiratory syncytial virus with that of BioFire Respiratory Panel 2.1 (RP2.1) using 175 nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens. Positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement of the PowerChek assay compared to RP2.1 were as follows: 100% (40/40) and 100% (135/135) for SARS-CoV-2; 100% (39/39) and 100% (136/136) for influenza A; 100% (35/35) and 100% (140/140) for influenza B; and 93.1% (27/29) and 100% (146/146) for RSV, respectively. The limit of detection (LOD) was accessed using RNA standards for each virus, and the LOD values of the PowerChek assay for SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and B, and RSV were 0.36, 1.24, 0.09, and 0.63 copies/μL, respectively. Our results demonstrate that the PowerChek assay is sensitive and accurate for detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and B, and RSV, suggesting that this assay can be a valuable diagnostic tool when SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and RSV are co-circulating.
 
  Search related documents: 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date