Author: Bartoszko, Jessica J.; Farooqi, Mohammed Abdul Malik; Alhazzani, Waleed; Loeb, Mark
Title: Medical masks vs N95 respirators for preventing COVIDâ€19 in healthcare workers: A systematic review and metaâ€analysis of randomized trials Cord-id: 1aqf98e0 Document date: 2020_4_21
ID: 1aqf98e0
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Respiratory protective devices are critical in protecting against infection in healthcare workers at high risk of novel 2019 coronavirus disease (COVIDâ€19); however, recommendations are conflicting and epidemiological data on their relative effectiveness against COVIDâ€19 are limited. PURPOSE: To compare medical masks to N95 respirators in preventing laboratoryâ€confirmed viral infection and respiratory illness including coronavirus specifically in healthcare workers. DATA SOURCE
Document: BACKGROUND: Respiratory protective devices are critical in protecting against infection in healthcare workers at high risk of novel 2019 coronavirus disease (COVIDâ€19); however, recommendations are conflicting and epidemiological data on their relative effectiveness against COVIDâ€19 are limited. PURPOSE: To compare medical masks to N95 respirators in preventing laboratoryâ€confirmed viral infection and respiratory illness including coronavirus specifically in healthcare workers. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from January 1, 2014, to March 9, 2020. Update of published search conducted from January 1, 1990, to December 9, 2014. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the protective effect of medical masks to N95 respirators in healthcare workers. DATA EXTRACTION: Reviewer pair independently screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four RCTs were metaâ€analyzed adjusting for clustering. Compared with N95 respirators; the use of medical masks did not increase laboratoryâ€confirmed viral (including coronaviruses) respiratory infection (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.90â€1.25; I (2) = 0%; low certainty in the evidence) or clinical respiratory illness (OR 1.49; 95% CI: 0.98â€2.28; I (2) = 78%; very low certainty in the evidence). Only one trial evaluated coronaviruses separately and found no difference between the two groups (P = .49). LIMITATIONS: Indirectness and imprecision of available evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Low certainty evidence suggests that medical masks and N95 respirators offer similar protection against viral respiratory infection including coronavirus in healthcare workers during non–aerosolâ€generating care. Preservation of N95 respirators for highâ€risk, aerosolâ€generating procedures in this pandemic should be considered when in short supply.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date