Author: Lawson, J; Gauw, S; van Vlijmen, C; Pronk, P; Gaastra, M; Mooij, M; Wittens, C H A
Title: Sapheon: the solution? Cord-id: 0mjqrony Document date: 2013_1_1
ID: 0mjqrony
Snippet: Less invasive endovenous techniques have been shown to be as effective as open surgery in the treatment of varicose veins. Furthermore, they cause less postoperative bruising and pain and enable early return to normal activities and work. Tumescent anaesthesia is safe and obviates complications of general or spinal anaesthesia. Drawbacks are a steep learning curve and painful administration during treatment. Tumescentless techniques like Clariveinâ„¢ or VenaSealâ„¢ Sapheon Closure System are rec
Document: Less invasive endovenous techniques have been shown to be as effective as open surgery in the treatment of varicose veins. Furthermore, they cause less postoperative bruising and pain and enable early return to normal activities and work. Tumescent anaesthesia is safe and obviates complications of general or spinal anaesthesia. Drawbacks are a steep learning curve and painful administration during treatment. Tumescentless techniques like Clariveinâ„¢ or VenaSealâ„¢ Sapheon Closure System are recently under investigation. Short-term results of VenaSealâ„¢ are comparable with thermal ablation. The procedure is safe without serious adverse events. Perioperative pain and patient discomfort with this tumescentless approach is minimal but postoperative recovery is temporarily hindered by thrombophlebitis in 14-15 % of patients. One-year results in a small feasibility study has demonstrated durable closure at this endpoint. No longer-term results are available. A randomized control trial between VenaSealâ„¢ and Covidien ClosureFastâ„¢ is in a preparatory phase.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date