Selected article for: "fatality rate and IFR infection fatality rate"

Author: Campbell, H.; Gustafson, P.
Title: Inferring the COVID-19 IFR with a simple Bayesian evidence synthesis of seroprevalence study data and imprecise mortality data
  • Cord-id: 1bbopan1
  • Document date: 2021_5_13
  • ID: 1bbopan1
    Snippet: Estimating the COVID-19 infection fatality rate (IFR) has proven to be particularly challenging --and rather controversial-- due to the fact that both the data on deaths and the data on the number of individuals infected are subject to many different biases. We consider a Bayesian evidence synthesis approach which, while simple enough for researchers to understand and use, accounts for many important sources of uncertainty inherent in both the seroprevalence and mortality data. We estimate the C
    Document: Estimating the COVID-19 infection fatality rate (IFR) has proven to be particularly challenging --and rather controversial-- due to the fact that both the data on deaths and the data on the number of individuals infected are subject to many different biases. We consider a Bayesian evidence synthesis approach which, while simple enough for researchers to understand and use, accounts for many important sources of uncertainty inherent in both the seroprevalence and mortality data. We estimate the COVID-19 IFR to be 0.38% (95% prediction interval of (0.03%, 1.19%)) for a typical population where the proportion of those aged over 65 years old is 9% (the approximate worldwide value). Our results suggest that, despite immense efforts made to better understand the COVID-19 IFR, there remains a large amount of uncertainty and unexplained heterogeneity surrounding this important statistic.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • actual time and additional study: 1
    • actual time and local national: 1
    • adaptation facilitate and local national: 1
    • additional study and local national: 1