Selected article for: "CT scan and specificity sensitivity"

Author: tung chen, y.; Marti de Gracia, M.; DiezTascon, A.; Agudo-Fernandez, S.; Alonso-Gonzalez, R.; Rodriguez Fuertes, P.; Parra-Gordo, L.; Ossaba-Velez, S.; Llamas Fuentes, R.
Title: CORRELATION BETWEEN CHEST COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND LUNG ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19)
  • Cord-id: 1pg77f6t
  • Document date: 2020_5_12
  • ID: 1pg77f6t
    Snippet: INTRODUCTION: There is growing evidence regarding the imaging findings of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), in chest X-ray and Computed Tomography scan (CT). At this moment, the role of Lung Ultrasonography (LUS) has yet to be explored. OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the correlation between LUS findings and chest CT in confirmed (positive RT-PCR) or clinically highly suspicious (dyspnea, fever, myasthenia, gastrointestinal symptoms, dry cough, ageusia or anosmia) of
    Document: INTRODUCTION: There is growing evidence regarding the imaging findings of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), in chest X-ray and Computed Tomography scan (CT). At this moment, the role of Lung Ultrasonography (LUS) has yet to be explored. OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the correlation between LUS findings and chest CT in confirmed (positive RT-PCR) or clinically highly suspicious (dyspnea, fever, myasthenia, gastrointestinal symptoms, dry cough, ageusia or anosmia) of COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Prospective study carried out in the emergency department (ED) of confirmed or clinically highly suspicious COVID-19 patients who were subjected to a chest CT and concurrent LUS exam. An experienced ED physician performed the LUS exam blind to the clinical history and results of the CT scan, which were reviewed by two radiologists in consensus for signs compatible with COVID-19 (bilateral ground-glass opacities in peripheral distribution). Compatible LUS exam was considered a bilateral pattern of B-lines, irregular pleural line and subpleural consolidations. RESULTS: Between March and April 2020, fifty-one patients were consecutively enrolled. The indication for CT was a negative or indeterminate RT-PCR test (49.0%) followed by suspicion of pulmonary embolism (41.2%). Radiological signs compatible with COVID-19 were present in thirty-seven patients (72.5%) on CT scan and forty patients (78.4%) on LUS exam. The presence of LUS findings was correlated with a positive CT scan suggestive of COVID-19 (OR: 13.3, 95%CI: 4.5-39.6, p<0.001) with a sensitivity of 100.0% and a specificity of 78.6%, positive predictive value of 92.5% and negative of 100.0%. There was no missed diagnosis of COVID-19 with LUS compared to CT in our cohort. The LUS Score had a good correlation with CT total severity score (ICC 0.803, 95% CI 0.60-0.90, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: LUS presents similar accuracy compared to chest CT to detect lung abnormalities in COVID-19 patients.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • low sensitivity and lung involvement: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • low sensitivity and lung involvement severity: 1
    • low sensitivity and lung ultrasonography: 1
    • low sensitivity and lus lung ultrasonography: 1
    • lung disease and lus correlation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • lung disease and lus detect: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • lung disease and lus diagnostic performance: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • lung disease and lus finding: 1
    • lung disease and lus lung ultrasonography: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • lung disease and lus normal: 1
    • lung disease and lus replace: 1
    • lung involvement and lus correlation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • lung involvement and lus detect: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • lung involvement and lus diagnostic performance: 1, 2
    • lung involvement and lus finding: 1, 2
    • lung involvement and lus lung ultrasonography: 1
    • lung involvement and lus normal: 1, 2, 3
    • lung involvement severity and lus correlation: 1