Selected article for: "morbidity postoperative mortality and postoperative mortality"

Author: Gehrig, Tobias; Josef, V; Billeter, A T; Warschkow, R; Knebel, P; Gutt, C N; Diener, M K; Tarantino, I
Title: Dissection with LigaSure Impactâ„¢ versus conventional resection in pylorus-preserving partial pancreatoduodenectomy (DISSECT): a single-institution randomized controlled trial.
  • Cord-id: 0gtc2jxm
  • Document date: 2020_8_22
  • ID: 0gtc2jxm
    Snippet: PURPOSE In partial pancreatoduodenectomy, appropriate effective hemostasis during dissection is of major importance for procedural flow, operation time, and postoperative outcome. As ligation, clipping, or suturing of blood vessels is time-consuming and numerous instrument changes are required, the primary aim of this randomized controlled trial was to assess whether LigaSure Impactâ„¢ exhibits benefits over named conventional dissection techniques in patients undergoing pylorus-preserving parti
    Document: PURPOSE In partial pancreatoduodenectomy, appropriate effective hemostasis during dissection is of major importance for procedural flow, operation time, and postoperative outcome. As ligation, clipping, or suturing of blood vessels is time-consuming and numerous instrument changes are required, the primary aim of this randomized controlled trial was to assess whether LigaSure Impactâ„¢ exhibits benefits over named conventional dissection techniques in patients undergoing pylorus-preserving partial pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS This single-institution, randomized, superiority trial was performed between September 27, 2009, and February 24, 2012. Patients undergoing pylorus-preserving partial pancreatoduodenectomy were allocated to the study arms in a 1:1 ratio based on an unstratified block randomization with random block sizes to receive either dissection with LigaSure Impactâ„¢ or conventional dissection. The primary endpoint was operation time. Secondary endpoints included peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay. To observe a time reduction of 40 min, 51 patients per arm were required. The primary analysis was the intention to treat. RESULTS The mean operation time did not differ between the Ligasure Impactâ„¢ (308 min; SD: 56 min; range: 155-455 min) and the conventional dissection (318 min; SD: 90 min, range: 175-550 min) (p = 0.531). Moreover, LigaSure Impactâ„¢ dissection did not show significant advantages over conventional dissection in terms of peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality, intraoperative blood loss, or length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS The application of LigaSure Impactâ„¢ dissection in pylorus-preserving partial pancreatoduodenectomy does not increase effectiveness and safety of dissection. TRIAL REGISTRATION DRKS00000166.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Try single phrases listed below for: 1
    Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date