Author: Lechien, Jérôme R.; Radulesco, Thomas; Distinguin, Lea; Chekkoury-Idrissi, Younes; Circiu, Marta P.; Afia, Fahd EL; Michel, Justin; Papon, Jean-François; Hans, Stephane
Title: Patient and otolaryngologist perceptions of telemedicine during COVID-19 pandemic Cord-id: 1x4p8nsy Document date: 2021_2_1
ID: 1x4p8nsy
Snippet: BACKGROUND: The rapid spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 and the implementation of quarantine in many European countries led to a swift change in health care delivery. Telemedicine was implemented in many otolaryngological departments to ensure the continuous care. The purpose of this study is to report our experience about telemedicine in 86 patients consulting virtually in our departments. METHODS: A total of 86 patients benefited from telemedicine consultation from April to Mai May 2020.
Document: BACKGROUND: The rapid spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 and the implementation of quarantine in many European countries led to a swift change in health care delivery. Telemedicine was implemented in many otolaryngological departments to ensure the continuous care. The purpose of this study is to report our experience about telemedicine in 86 patients consulting virtually in our departments. METHODS: A total of 86 patients benefited from telemedicine consultation from April to Mai May 2020. Patients and physicians were invited to fulfill a satisfaction survey over the 3 days after the consultation. RESULTS: Patients consulted in the following fields: laryngology, voice and swallowing (N=15; 17.4%), head and neck or plastic surgery (N=34; 39.5%), rhinology (N=31; 36.1%) and otology (N=6; 7.0%). Practitioners estimated that the clinical examination would not have changed the consultation issue in 73.2% of cases. The realization of delayed clinical examination was rapidly necessary in 9.3% of cases and useless in 33.7% of cases. Five percent of patients estimated that the consultation did not bring reliable conclusion. Although the majority of patient (87.7%) would recommend telemedicine consultation to friend/family in the context of pandemic, only 44.6% would accept to replace office- consultation by telemedicine consultation outside the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine appears to be an interesting alternative approach in situation of pandemic and lock-down. Because the patient motivation to further participate to telemedicine appears to be conditioned by the context, efforts are still required to understand the patient perception, satisfaction and fears in view of future implementation outside pandemic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-021-06624-9.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- additional examination and low number: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date