Author: Nishimura, Sadaaki; Sugimoto, Atsushi; Kushiyama, Shuhei; Togano, Shingo; Kuroda, Kenji; Yamamoto, Yurie; Yamauchi, Makoto; Sumi, Toshiyuki; Kaneda, Hiroyasu; Kawaguchi, Tomoya; Kato, Minoru; Tagami, Mizuki; Oebisu, Naoto; Hoshi, Manabu; Kimura, Kenjiro; Kubo, Shoji; Muguruma, Kazuya; Takashima, Tsutomu; Ohira, Masaichi; Yashiro, Masakazu
Title: Clinical benefit for clinical sequencing using cancer panel testing Cord-id: 0imf4msl Document date: 2021_2_26
ID: 0imf4msl
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Clinical sequencing using a panel of genes has recently been applied worldwide for patients with refractory solid tumors, but the significance of clinical sequencing using gene panel testing remains uncertain. Here we sought to clarify the feasibility and utility of clinical sequencing in the treatment of refractory tumors at our hospital. METHODS: A total of 39 patients with advanced solid tumors treated at our hospital between 2018 and 2020 were enrolled in the clinical sequencing.
Document: BACKGROUND: Clinical sequencing using a panel of genes has recently been applied worldwide for patients with refractory solid tumors, but the significance of clinical sequencing using gene panel testing remains uncertain. Here we sought to clarify the feasibility and utility of clinical sequencing in the treatment of refractory tumors at our hospital. METHODS: A total of 39 patients with advanced solid tumors treated at our hospital between 2018 and 2020 were enrolled in the clinical sequencing. Among them, we identified 36 patients whose tissue samples were of suitable quality for clinical sequencing, and we analyzed the genomic profiles of these tumors. RESULTS: Pathogenic alterations were detected in 28 (78%) of the 36 patients. The most common mutation was TP53 (55%), followed by KRAS (22%), and the highest frequency of gene amplification was ERBB2 (17%). Nine of the 36 patients were identified as candidates for novel molecular-targeted therapy based on their actionable gene alterations, but only one case ended up receiving novel targeted therapy following the genetic tests. CONCLUSIONS: Our current results suggested that clinical sequencing might be useful for the detection of pathogenic alterations and the management of additional cancer treatment. However, molecular target based on actionable genomic alteration does not always bridge to subsequent therapy due to clinical deterioration, refusal for unapproved drug, and complexity of clinical trial access. Both improved optimal timing of clinical sequencing and a consensus about its off-label use might help patients receive greater benefit from clinical sequencing.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- low frequency and lung cancer: 1, 2
- ma cambridge and ma waltham: 1
- ma cambridge and ma waltham thermo fisher scientific: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date