Selected article for: "control treatment group group and treatment group"

Author: Aguilera Xiol, E; Li Bassi, G; Wyncoll, D; Ntoumenopoulos, G; Fernandez-Barat, L; Marti, J D; Comaru, T; De Rosa, F; Rigol, M; Rinaudo, M; Ferrer, M; Torres, A
Title: Tracheal tube biofilm removal through a novel closed-suctioning system: an experimental study.
  • Cord-id: 19dgnpjv
  • Document date: 2015_1_1
  • ID: 19dgnpjv
    Snippet: BACKGROUND Tracheal tube biofilm develops during mechanical ventilation. We compared a novel closed-suctioning system vs standard closed-suctioning system in the prevention of tracheal tube biofilm. METHODS Eighteen pigs, on mechanical ventilation for 76 h, with P. aeruginosa pneumonia were randomized to be tracheally suctioned via the KIMVENT* closed-suctioning system (control group) or a novel closed-suctioning system (treatment group), designed to remove tracheal tube biofilm through saline j
    Document: BACKGROUND Tracheal tube biofilm develops during mechanical ventilation. We compared a novel closed-suctioning system vs standard closed-suctioning system in the prevention of tracheal tube biofilm. METHODS Eighteen pigs, on mechanical ventilation for 76 h, with P. aeruginosa pneumonia were randomized to be tracheally suctioned via the KIMVENT* closed-suctioning system (control group) or a novel closed-suctioning system (treatment group), designed to remove tracheal tube biofilm through saline jets and an inflatable balloon. Upon autopsy, two tracheal tube hemi-sections were dissected for confocal and scanning electron microscopy. Biofilm area, maximal and minimal thickness were computed. Biofilm stage was assessed. RESULTS Sixteen animals were included in the final analysis. In the treatment and control group, the mean (sd) pulmonary burden was 3.34 (1.28) and 4.17 (1.09) log cfu gr(-1), respectively (P=0.18). Tracheal tube P. aeruginosa colonization was 5.6 (4.9-6.3) and 6.2 (5.6-6.9) cfu ml(-1) (median and interquartile range) in the treatment and control group, respectively (P=0.23). In the treatment group, median biofilm area was 3.65 (3.22-4.21) log10 μm2 compared with 4.49 (4.27-4.52) log10 μm2 in the control group (P=0.031). In the treatment and control groups, the maximal biofilm thickness was 48.3 (26.7-71.2) µm (median and interquartile range) and 88.8 (43.8-125.7) µm, respectively. The minimal thickness in the treatment and control group was 0.6 (0-4.0) µm and 23.7 (5.3-27.8) µm (P=0.040) (P=0.017). Earlier stages of biofilm development were found in the treatment group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The novel CSS reduces biofilm accumulation within the tracheal tube. A clinical trial is required to confirm these findings and the impact on major outcomes.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Try single phrases listed below for: 1
    Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date