Author: Bingham, Daniel D.; Daly-Smith, Andy; Hall, Jennifer; Seims, Amanda; Dogra, Sufyan A.; Fairclough, Stuart J.; Ajebon, Mildred; Kelly, Brian; Hou, Bo; Shire, Katy A.; Crossley, Kirsty L.; Mon-Williams, Mark; Wright, John; Pickett, Kate; McEachan, Rosemary; Dickerson, Josie; Barber, Sally E.
Title: Covid-19 lockdown: Ethnic differences in children’s self-reported physical activity and the importance of leaving the home environment; a longitudinal and cross-sectional study from the Born in Bradford birth cohort study Cord-id: 10a17loi Document date: 2021_9_6
ID: 10a17loi
Snippet: BACKGROUND: In England, the onset of COVID-19 and a rapidly increasing infection rate resulted in a lockdown (March-June 2020) which placed strict restrictions on movement of the public, including children. Using data collected from children living in a multi-ethnic city with high levels of deprivation, this study aimed to: (1) report children’s self-reported physical activity (PA) during the first COVID-19 UK lockdown and identify associated factors; (2) examine changes of children’s self-r
Document: BACKGROUND: In England, the onset of COVID-19 and a rapidly increasing infection rate resulted in a lockdown (March-June 2020) which placed strict restrictions on movement of the public, including children. Using data collected from children living in a multi-ethnic city with high levels of deprivation, this study aimed to: (1) report children’s self-reported physical activity (PA) during the first COVID-19 UK lockdown and identify associated factors; (2) examine changes of children’s self-reported PA prior to and during the first UK lockdown. METHODS: This study is part of the Born in Bradford (BiB) COVID-19 Research Study. PA (amended Youth Activity Profile), sleep, sedentary behaviours, daily frequency/time/destination/activity when leaving the home, were self-reported by 949 children (9–13 years). A sub-sample (n = 634) also self-reported PA (Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children) pre-pandemic (2017-February 2020). Univariate analysis assessed differences in PA between sex and ethnicity groups; multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with children’s PA. Differences in children's levels of being sufficiently active prior to and during the lockdown were examined using the McNemar test; and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors explaining change. RESULTS: During the pandemic, White British (WB) children were more sufficiently active (34.1%) compared to Pakistani Heritage children (PH) (22.8%) or ‘Other’ ethnicity children (O) (22.8%). WB children reported leaving the home more frequently and for longer periods than PH and O children. Modifiable variables related to being sufficiently active were frequency, duration, type of activity, and destination away from the home environment. There was a large reduction in children being sufficiently active during the first COVID-19 lockdown (28.9%) compared to pre-pandemic (69.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Promoting safe extended periods of PA everyday outdoors is important for all children, in particular for children from ethnic minority groups. Children’s PA during the first COVID-19 UK lockdown has drastically reduced from before. Policy and decision makers, and practitioners should consider the findings in order to begin to understand the impact and consequences that COVID-19 has had upon children’s PA which is a key and vital behaviour for health and development. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-021-01183-y.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- adolescent child and lockdown impact: 1, 2, 3, 4
- adolescent child and lockdown period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- adolescent child and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
- adolescent child and long term short: 1, 2, 3, 4
- lockdown impact and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49
- lockdown impact and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- lockdown impact and long term short: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- lockdown impact study and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- lockdown impact study and logistic regression model: 1, 2
- lockdown impact study and long term short: 1, 2
- lockdown measure and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
- lockdown measure and logistic regression model: 1
- lockdown pa and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
- lockdown period and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66
- lockdown period and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- lockdown period and long term short: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date