Selected article for: "access healthcare and logistic regression examine"
Author: Chinchilla, Melissa; Yue, Dahai; Ponce, Ninez A.
Title: Housing Insecurity Among Latinxs
  • Cord-id: 1kgpydpr
  • Document date: 2021_7_31
    • ID: 1kgpydpr
    Snippet: Latinxs are vulnerable to experiencing housing insecurity and less likely to receive public benefits, such as health insurance, which can impact a household’s economic resources. We inform homelessness prevention by examining the association of social risks and healthcare access with housing insecurity for Latinxs. Our sample consisted of 120,362 participants under the age of 65, of which 17.3% were Latinx. Weighted chi-squared tests and logistic regression were used to examine predictors of h
    Document: Latinxs are vulnerable to experiencing housing insecurity and less likely to receive public benefits, such as health insurance, which can impact a household’s economic resources. We inform homelessness prevention by examining the association of social risks and healthcare access with housing insecurity for Latinxs. Our sample consisted of 120,362 participants under the age of 65, of which 17.3% were Latinx. Weighted chi-squared tests and logistic regression were used to examine predictors of housing insecurity. Housing insecurity was measured as worry about paying for housing. Latinxs were almost twice as likely as non-Latinxs to worry about paying for housing. Excellent/fair health status, health service use, and having health insurance decreased the likelihood of housing insecurity for Latinxs. Access to health insurance, regardless of citizenship status, and use of preventative healthcare to maintain good health can be protective against housing insecurity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10903-021-01258-9.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • logistic regression and los angeles: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • logistic regression and low earning: 1
    • logistic regression and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • logistic regression and low income household: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • logistic regression and low insurance coverage: 1, 2
    • logistic regression and low likelihood: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • logistic regression and low socioeconomic status: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • los angeles and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10