Selected article for: "accidental removal and acute care"

Author: Lee, Laurie A.; Moss, Stephana J.; Martin, Dori-Ann; Rosgen, Brianna K.; Wollny, Krista; Gilfoyle, Elaine; Fiest, Kirsten M.
Title: Comfort-holding in critically ill children: a scoping review
  • Cord-id: 1oxw3f3z
  • Document date: 2021_8_17
  • ID: 1oxw3f3z
    Snippet: PURPOSE: To understand and summarize the breadth of knowledge on comfort-holding in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). SOURCES: This scoping review was conducted using PRISMA methodology. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials. Search strategies were developed with a medical librarian and revised through a peer review of electronic search strategies. All databases were searched from inception to 14 April
    Document: PURPOSE: To understand and summarize the breadth of knowledge on comfort-holding in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). SOURCES: This scoping review was conducted using PRISMA methodology. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials. Search strategies were developed with a medical librarian and revised through a peer review of electronic search strategies. All databases were searched from inception to 14 April 2020. Only full-text articles available in English were included. All identified articles were reviewed independently and in duplicate using predetermined criteria. All study designs were eligible if they reported on comfort-holding in a PICU. Data were extracted independently and in duplicate. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Of 13,326 studies identified, 13 were included. Comfort-holding was studied in the context of end-of-life care, developmental care, mobilization, and as a unique intervention. Comfort-holding is common during end-of-life care with 77.8% of children held, but rare during acute management (51% of children < three years, < 5% of children ≥ three years). Commonly reported outcomes included child outcomes (e.g., physiologic measurements), safety outcomes (e.g., accidental line removal), parent outcomes (e.g., psychological symptoms), and frequency of holding. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of literature on comfort-holding in PICUs. This scoping review identifies significant gaps in the literature, including assessment of child-based outcomes of comfort-holding or safety assessment of comfort-holding, and highlights core outcomes to consider in future evaluations of this intervention including child-based outcomes, parent-based outcomes, and safety of the intervention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-021-02090-3.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abstract title and acutely ill: 1, 2
    • abstract title and additional study: 1, 2
    • abstract title and long term short: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • abstract title screening and acutely ill: 1
    • abstract title screening and additional study: 1
    • abstract title screening and long term short: 1
    • acute management and long term short: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acutely ill and long term short: 1
    • additional study and long term short: 1
    • additional study and low appear: 1
    • long term short and low appear: 1